by Itamar Marcus

Opinion

Russian President Vladimir Putin and Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian attend a ceremony to sign an agreement of comprehensive strategic partnership between the two countries, at the Kremlin in Moscow, Russia, Jan. 17, 2025. Photo: Sputnik/Vyacheslav Prokofyev/Pool via REUTERS

The Palestinian Authority (PA) has unequivocally aligned itself with the anti-American axis led by China and Russia. This is a deceitful betrayal of the United States and Western European nations, whose billions in aid have kept the PA out of financial collapse and sustained its very existence.

This fundamental alliance was on full display during PA leader Mahmoud Abbas’ participation in a major event held in Moscow on May 9, during which he warmly embraced Russian President Vladimir Putin as seen in the picture below.

The official PA daily was proud to report that Abbas’ attendance was at the “official invitation” of Putin, and “he also participated in the official dinner that Putin held in honor of [world] leaders” [Official PA daily Al-Hayat Al-Jadida, May 10, 2025].

[Official PA daily Al-Hayat Al-Jadida, May 9, 2025]

The event was the 80th Moscow Victory Day Parade, celebrating Nazi Germany’s surrender in World War II. The combination of Abbas, Moscow, and the Nazis is highly ironic, given that Abbas previously was in Moscow as a student, where he wrote a doctoral thesis on his Holocaust denial.Abbas met with both Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping at the event, warmly shaking hands with them and stressing the PA’s “strategic partnership” with their countries.

In his meeting with Xi, Abbas thanked the Chinese leader for the important “strategic partnership between the State of Palestine and its friend the People’s Republic of China.”:

Abbas expressed to the Chinese president his gratitude and appreciation for China’s positions that support our Palestinian people and its just cause in the international forums. He also gave thanks for the humanitarian aid and development aid that China presents to the Palestinian people.

The president emphasized the importance of the strategic partnership between the State of Palestine and its friend the People’s Republic of China. [emphasis added] [Official PA daily Al-Hayat Al-Jadida, May 10, 2025]

Speaking with Putin, the PA chairman not only thanked Russia for its support, but also urged it to “develop” further bilateral ties “in various fields”:

During his meeting with … Putin … the president praised the historical relations between Palestine and Russia. He expressed his appreciation for Russia’s fixed positions in favor of the Palestinian people and its just rights 

He also discussed with his Russian counterpart the strengthening of the historical ties of friendship between the two states and ways to develop them in various fields, in a way that serves the interests of the two peoples. [Official PA daily Al-Hayat Al-Jadida, May 9, 2025] [Official PA daily Al-Hayat Al-Jadida, May 11, 2025]

This overt embrace of the anti-US axis further solidifies a position that has been repeatedly reiterated by the PA. For example, during a visit to Russia in May 2024, Abbas’ advisor Mahmoud Al-Habbash called for a “new multipolar world order” comprised of “the Islamic world, Russia and China.”

In a similar vein, in a meeting with the Chinese ambassador this April, Fatah General Commissioner for Arab and China Relations Abbas Zaki called China the “savior of humanity” against the threat of “the Zionist-American alliance.”

Given Abbas’ call to further “develop” ties with Russia and China, it can only be assumed that the PA will continue to take a more pronounced position in support of America’s opponents. Abbas already displayed this stance when he recently cursed America, saying: “May their father be cursed.”

The author is the Founder and Director of Palestinian Media Watch, where a version of this article first appeared.


Iran is open to a deal but distrusts Trump. Saudi Arabia is trying to prevent a regional war that could hurt its economy and stability.

 Illustrative image of Saudi crown prince Mohammed bin Salman (photo credit: Canva, GoodFon, REUTERS/Nathan Howard/Pool)
Illustrative image of Saudi crown prince Mohammed bin Salman
(photo credit: Canva, GoodFon, REUTERS/Nathan Howard/Pool)
Saudi Arabia‘s defense minister delivered a blunt message to Iranian officials in Tehran last month: take President Donald Trump’s offer to negotiate a nuclear agreement seriously because it presents a way to avoid the risk of war with Israel.

Alarmed at the prospect of further instability in the region, Saudi Arabia’s 89-year-old King Salman bin Abdulaziz dispatched his son, Prince Khalid bin Salman, with the warning destined for Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, according to two Gulf sources close to government circles and two Iranian officials.

Present at the closed-door meeting in Tehran, which took place on April 17 in the presidential compound, were Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, armed forces Chief of Staff Mohammad Bagheri, and Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi, the sources said.

While the media covered the 37-year-old prince’s visit, the content of King Salman’s covert message has not been previously reported.

Prince Khalid, who was Saudi ambassador to Washington during Trump’s first term, warned Iranian officials that the US leader has little patience for drawn-out negotiations, according to the four sources.

 L to R: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, US President Donald Trump against backdrop of Iranian flag (illustration). (credit: Hossein Beris/Middle East Images/AFP via Getty Images, Olivier Douliery-Pool via Getty Images)Enlrage image
L to R: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, US President Donald Trump against backdrop of Iranian flag (illustration). (credit: Hossein Beris/Middle East Images/AFP via Getty Images, Olivier Douliery-Pool via Getty Images)

Trump had unexpectedly announced just over a week earlier that direct talks were taking place with Tehran, aimed at curbing Iran’s nuclear program in return for sanctions relief. He did so in the presence of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who had traveled to Washington hoping instead to win support for attacks on Iranian nuclear sites.

In Tehran, Prince Khalid told the group of senior Iranian officials that Trump’s team would want to reach a deal quickly, and the window for diplomacy would close fast, according to the four sources.

The Saudi minister said it would be better to reach a deal with the US than face the possibility of an Israeli attack if the talks broke down, according to the two Gulf sources.

He argued that the region, already riven by recent conflicts in Gaza and Lebanon, could not withstand a further escalation in tensions, said the two Gulf sources and one senior foreign diplomat familiar with the discussions.

Authorities in Saudi Arabia and Iran did not respond to requests for comment.

The visit by Prince Khalid, the younger brother of Crown Prince Mohamed Bin Salman, was the first by a senior member of the Saudi royal family to Iran in more than two decades. Riyadh and Tehran had long been bitter rivals, often backing opposing sides in proxy wars, until a rapprochement brokered by China in 2023 helped to ease the tensions and restored diplomatic ties.

Over the past two years, Iran’s regional position has been undermined by heavy military blows inflicted by Israel on its allies Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon, and the toppling of its close ally, Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad. Western sanctions, meanwhile, have hit its oil-dependent economy hard.

Mohanad Hage Ali, an expert on Iran at the Carnegie Middle East Center think tank in Beirut, said that Tehran’s weakness had offered Saudi Arabia the opportunity to exert its diplomatic influence, seeking to avoid a regional conflagration.

“They want to avoid war because war and confrontation with Iran will have negative implications on them and their economic vision and ambitions,” he told Reuters.

Iran wants a deal

Reuters was unable to determine the impact of the prince’s message on Iran’s leadership.

In the meeting, Pezeshkian responded that Iran wanted a deal to ease economic pressure through the lifting of Western sanctions, the four sources said.

However, the Iranian officials, the sources added, expressed concerns over the Trump administration’s “unpredictable” approach to negotiations, which has veered from allowing limited uranium enrichment to demanding the complete dismantling of Tehran’s enrichment program.

Trump also has threatened to use military force if diplomacy fails to rein in the clerical establishment’s nuclear ambitions.

One of the Iranian sources said that Pezeshkian emphasized Tehran’s eagerness to reach a deal but that Iran was not willing to sacrifice its enrichment program just because Trump wanted an agreement.

The ongoing talks between Washington and Tehran have already been through five rounds to resolve the decades-long nuclear dispute. Still, multiple stumbling blocks remain, including the key issue of enrichment.

Reuters reported on Wednesday that Iran might pause uranium enrichment if the US releases its frozen funds and recognizes its right to refine uranium for civilian use under a “political deal” that could lead to a broader nuclear accord, according to two Iranian sources familiar with the talks. The semi-official Fars news agency in Iran quoted a foreign ministry spokesman denying the report.

The White House did not directly address Reuters’ questions about whether it was aware of the Saudi warning to Iran.

“President Trump has made it clear: make a deal, or face grave consequences, and the whole world is clearly taking him seriously, as they should,” White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement.

Trump said on Wednesday he warned Netanyahu last week not to take any actions that could disrupt nuclear talks with Iran, and said the two sides were “very close to a solution now.”

Israeli authorities did not respond to a request for comment.

High stakes Trump visit to the Middle East

A four-day visit by Trump to the Gulf this month anointed Saudi Arabia as the most prominent member of a new axis of Sunni states in the Middle East, filling the void left by Iran’s shattered alliance. During the trip, Saudi Crown Prince Mohamed Bin Salman mediated a reconciliation between Trump and Syria’s new Sunni leader, Ahmed al-Sharaa.

Tehran’s regional sway, meanwhile, has been diminished by military setbacks suffered by Iran and its allies in the Shi’ite-dominated Axis of Resistance, which includes Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis in Yemen, and Iraqi militias.

In the meeting, Prince Khalid urged Iran to rethink its regional policy, noting such a shift would be welcomed, especially by Riyadh, the sources said.

Although he stopped short of directly blaming Iran, the Saudi minister voiced concern over a possible repeat of the 2019 drone attacks on the facilities of the state oil company Aramco – attacks the kingdom attributed to Iran and its Houthi allies, despite Tehran’s denial.

Iranian officials maintained that while Tehran holds some influence over the Houthis, it does not fully control their actions, the Iranian sources said.

Decades of hostility between the Shi’ite Iran and Saudi Arabia destabilized the Gulf and fueled regional conflicts from Yemen to Syria. The 2023 detente was driven in part by Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed’s economic ambitions and desire for stability, and has led to increased contacts between the governments.

However, neither Saudi Arabia nor other regional powers see Iran as a dependable partner for peace, and they fear its actions could jeopardize their ambitions for economic development, diplomats and regional experts say.

Prince Khalid implored the Iranians to avoid actions by them and their allies that might provoke Washington. He stressed that Trump’s response would likely be more strident than that of his predecessors, presidents Joe Biden and Barack Obama.

In turn, he assured Tehran that Riyadh would not let its territory or airspace be used by the United States or Israel for any potential military action against Iran, the sources said.


Members of the Al-Qassam Brigades, the ‘military wing’ of Hamas (one of them a Yankees fan), attend the funeral of terrorists killed by the IDF in the Al-Shati neighborhood, Gaza City, February 28, 2025.

A senior Hamas official told the BBC early Friday morning that the terrorist group will reject the latest U.S. proposal for a new ceasefire and hostage release agreement in Gaza. The Hamas official said the proposal failed to meet the group’s core demands, including a complete end to the war.

The Israeli government did not issue an official comment, but Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu reportedly told families of the hostages on Thursday that he accepted Witkoff’s plan.

Yesterday, I wrote (Witkoff Offers Major Concessions to Hamas, Leaves Half the Hostages Behind) that this is an atrocious deal, reversing all of Israel’s gains over the past two and a half months of fighting and reviving the fast-declining Hamas. An online survey in Hebrew by blogger Abu Ali Express indicated that 69% of the 28,500 votes oppose the deal (77% oppose it when you exclude those without an opinion).

On Thursday night, the White House stated that while Israel had accepted the new proposal, Hamas had yet to respond. White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt said negotiations were still underway and any agreement, if reached, would be announced by the United States.

IT’S A VERY BAD PLAN

Haaretz reported Friday morning that the draft agreement for a ceasefire includes the following key clauses:

1. A 60-day ceasefire, with President Trump guaranteeing that Israel will halt all military activity during this period.

This essentially means that the IDF would be barred from responding to Hamas terrorist provocation without asking for US approval. If we thought Biden was depriving Israel of the power to defend itself properly, Trump would be sitting on our necks to appease his Saudi and Qatari business partners.

2. Hamas will release 10 live hostages and 18 bodies of hostages—half on the first day and half on the seventh day of the ceasefire.

This kisses away the policy of demanding that all our hostages be released at once, allowing Hamas to retain its power to influence Israeli politics through the remaining ten or so living hostages.

3. Humanitarian aid will enter the Gaza Strip once Hamas agrees to the deal. The aid will continue for the full duration of the ceasefire and will be distributed through mutually acceptable channels, including the UN and the Red Cross.

This robs the IDF of its success in denying Hamas the power to distribute food and medicine to Gazans. As soon as the source of humanitarian aid moved to the four delivery centers protected by Israel, Hamas started losing its clout, including its ability to stop Gazans from raiding its storehouses. Taking this power away from Israel would mean the revival of Hamas, its control over the civilian population, and its ability to recruit new terrorists.

4. Israel will halt all offensive operations once the agreement takes effect. No Israeli aerial activity will occur over Gaza for 10 hours daily—extended to 12 hours on days when hostages are released.

5. On the first day of the ceasefire, after the release of five hostages and nine bodies, the IDF will redeploy in northern Gaza and along the Netzarim corridor in accordance with humanitarian aid provisions and agreed-upon maps. On the seventh day, following the second release, the IDF will redeploy in southern Gaza similarly.

This would mean giving up the military and territorial gains won since mid-March. If Israel wished to retake those assets after 60 days, it would have to spill its soldiers’ blood anew. Once again, Hamas is able to force Israelis to fight over whose lives are more precious, the hostages or the soldiers.

6. Indirect talks through mediators will begin on day one of the ceasefire to negotiate a permanent agreement. Topics include the release of all remaining hostages, the release of terrorist prisoners, IDF withdrawal, long-term security arrangements, and post-war governance in Gaza.

In other words, it’s a gift to Hamas for committing the atrocities of October 7.

7. President Trump is committed to upholding the terms of the agreement and will ensure that any successful negotiations during the ceasefire lead to a lasting resolution of the conflict.

You’ll notice there is no concrete definition here of what constitutes a lasting resolution: does Hamas remain in place? Do the 2.2 million Gazans also stay put among the ruins? Would Hamas agree to any of the imaginative solutions Trump has come up with? Most likely, not.

8. In exchange for the 10 live hostages, Israel will release 125 prisoners serving life sentences and 1,111 Gazans detained after October 7. For the 18 bodies of hostages, Israel will return 180 Gazan bodies. Releases will be simultaneous and without ceremony—half on the first day, the rest on the seventh.

And we thought Israel was going to punish the murderers, rapists, and baby burners of October 7. Sometimes we are so naïve.

9. On the tenth day, Hamas will provide information about the remaining hostages, including signs of life or confirmation of death. In return, Israel will provide data on detained Gazans and the bodies in its custody. Hamas must guarantee the hostages’ health and safety during the ceasefire.

After more than 600 days, these killers will finally provide an account of who’s alive and who’s not, almost like civilized humans.

10. Remaining hostages will be released if a permanent ceasefire is agreed upon within 60 days. If talks are still ongoing at the end of the ceasefire, the truce may be extended to complete negotiations.

And Hamas continues to hold on to its hostages.

11. The U.S., Egypt, and Qatar will guarantee the ceasefire’s 60-day duration and any agreed extensions. They will also oversee serious efforts toward a permanent resolution.

12. Steve Witkoff will arrive in the region to lead the negotiations and finalize the agreement.

13. President Trump will personally announce the agreement and ensure U.S. commitment to the negotiation process until a final deal is reached.

As I said in the headline, thank God for Hamas’s rejection of this terrible deal.