Syria sent drones to strike at an American military Syria outpost in Tanf. However, the strikes were not just targeting the US.
A drone is launched during a large-scale drone combat exercise of Army of the Islamic Republic of Iran, in Semnan, Iran January 6, 2021.
(photo credit: IRANIAN ARMY/WANA (WEST ASIA NEWS AGENCY) VIA REUTERS)
Iran conducted a complex and coordinated attack on US forces in Syria last week. It used up to five armed drones to strike at the Tanf garrison, a lonely US outpost in Syria near the Jordanian and Iraqi border.
The assessment by the US is that Iran was behind this attack. It is the latest of numerous drone attacks on US forces in the region this year. Iranian-backed groups in Iraq have used drones to target US forces at Erbil airport and other locations. The attacks also are part of the rising Iranian drone threat across the region. This means the attack on Tanf is a message not just for the US, but also for Israel, Saudi Arabia and other countries facing Iran’s drones.
Pentagon spokesman John Kirby said the Tanf attack was “complex, coordinated and deliberate attack.” But the US didn’t go into more specifics, reports said. US knowledge about the planning of the attack appears to be more than is being reported in media. This is because reports say that the US was “tipped off” to the attack and that around 200 troops were evacuated on a C-130 transport, according to Fox News.
It is not the first time the US had some knowledge an attack was coming and prepared for it. In January 2020 after the US killed Iranian IRGC Quds Force leader Qasem Soleimani the US received hours of warning about an Iranian ballistic missile attack on Al-Asad base in Iraq. Troops were sent to bunkers and sensitive equipment was moved away.
Reuters says that on the night of January 7 “not a single fighter jet or helicopter remained out in the open.” The attack came after midnight. The US similarly avoided casualties at Tanf. But the advanced knowledge raises questions about why the US didn’t try to pre-empt the attack or interdict it before it happened. It also raises questions about lack of air defenses for US facilities. Reports indicate US forces tried out counter-UAS technology called Smart Shooter in June 2020, a technology used for countering small drones. For larger drones one needs a system more like Israel’s Iron Dome, which can counter drones. The US has two Iron Dome batteries, but they are based in Guam according to reports.
What this tells us is that the US had some prior knowledge about Iranian threats to Tanf. It’s not the first time Tanf has been threatened. An Iranian drone also threatened the area in 2017 and the US shot the drone down. Tanf has a 55km “de-confliction” zone around it, meaning the US reserves the right to defend the area up to 55km. That’s a big radius and keeps any prying eyes away. But Iran and its militias want the Americans to feel vulnerable. Iran has been testing US defenses in Iraq and Syria.
Iran has also used Syria to base drones for attacks on Israel. In February 2018 an Iranian drone from the T-4 base near Palmyra flew into Israeli airspace. Israel shot it down. In May 2021 another Iranian drone, perhaps brought from Iraq, flew into Israeli airspace and was downed. In August 2019 Israel struck a Hezbollah “killer drone” team that was operating near the Golan border. That means that Iran’s drone threats to the US in Iraq and Syria come in the context of Iran’s drone threats across the region and also its attempts to target Israel.
The Iranian drones being used in Iraq and Syria may also be of a similar type to those used by the Iranian-backed Houthis in Yemen. These are basically large flying tubes with wings and the tube can be backed with explosives so the drone is a kind of kamikaze device, not so different than a German V-1 in the Second World War.
Some of these drones are called Samad type drones, and they come in several types, Samad-1, Samad-2 and Samad-3. In a July analysis of the Iran-backed drone threat in Iraq Farzin Nadimi, an associate fellow with The Washington Institute and Michael Knights, the Boston-based Jill and Jay Bernstein Fellow of The Washington Institute, noted the similarities in the drones.
The Iraqi PMU, which is also called Hashd al-Shaabi and consists of Iranian-backed militias, had paraded drones in Iraq. One type was called Sahab. “Like the Samad, Sahab is equipped with long-range transceiver antennas for precision GPS navigation. According to the UN Panel of Experts on Yemen, which examined numerous crashed examples of Samad, its extended-range version (Samad-3) can fly over 1,000 km. Six Sahab drones were shown at the parade,” the authors note. The Houthi-style Samad, which is based on Iranian technology and backing, was already present in Iraq in May 2020 Nick Water, Digital Investigation expert at Bellingcat made note of this at the time.
Nadimi and Knights also noted how brazen the parade of Iranian-style drones was. “The admission of Sahab/Samad fixed-wing drones is also interesting considering their closeness to the KAS-04 (Samad-type) systems used in at least five drone attacks on U.S. facilities since April 2021.” Basically, Iran was showing its cards in Iraq. Iranian-backed Houthis also show off their drones. Many of these have been used against Saudi Arabia and run the gamut from the Samad types to the Qasef and Qasef 2K and other drones. There’s no secret here. The drones are often on display, like birds at a zoo.
An April INSS article by Ari Heistein and Elisha Stoin noted that “The Houthis have an extensive arsenal of UAVs, including long-range Samad[24] models. The group used Samad UAVs for long-range attacks in 2018 (Abu Dhabi) and then again in 2019 (Riyadh). However, the Samad-3, which claims an operational range of 1,800 km – theoretically enough to conduct attack on Israel – will have limited ability to inflict damage on Israeli infrastructure, given its 45 kg warhead.”
The Houthis also have a delta-wing drone called Waid. Knights described this drone as well: “The use of delta-wing attack drones and Quds-2 cruise missiles. Also shown at the March exhibition, Waid is the Houthi name for the loitering munition that Iran used to attack Saudi pipelines and the Abqaiq oil facility in May and September 2019, respectively.”
The Waid drone supposedly can fly 2,500km and reach Israel. In January Newsweek wrote that “imagery seen by Newsweek and confirmed by an expert who follows Iranian activities in the region indicate the presence of Iranian Shahed-136 loitering munitions, also called ‘suicide drones,’ deployed to the northern Yemeni province of Al-Jawf, an area of the country controlled by the Ansar Allah, or Houthi, Zaidi Shiite Muslim rebel movement.” It was unclear if the Shahed 136, which had not previously been known, is similar or the same as the Waid.
Closer to Israel, Hamas also has the Shehab drone, unveiled in the May war in Gaza. Drone expert Joseph Trevithick wrote at The Drive in May that “while Hamas’ claims it is entirely indigenous development, this drone’s general configuration, at least externally, is similar in some respects to the Houthis’ Qasef-series, as well as the Iranian Ababil-T, from which the former is at least derived.”
The October 20 attack on Tanf then is part of the wider context of drone attacks by Iran or its proxies across the region. The importance of defending against these kinds of threats and dominating the air is clear for every country these days in the Middle East. Israel is hosting the Blue Flag exercise alongside air forces from the US, Germany, France, Greece, India, Italy, and the UK. The UAE’s Air Force head was in Israel this week.
The overall context of the Tanf attack is that its complexity is a warning to Israel. Like the Abqaiq attack by Iran using drones and cruise missiles in September 2019, another complex drone attack has taken place in the region. Iran is using the Houthis and militias in Iraq, as well as Hamas to test out its drone technology. Iran also used drones to target a tanker in the Gulf of Oman in July. The US, UK and Israel blamed Iran for that attack which killed two crew members of the civilian ship. In that case, an Iranian drone flew into the bridge of the ship, likely a targeted purposeful attempt to kill the crew. Questions about how Iran had the coordinates of the ship and was able to guide the drone into that precise location remain to be answered. It shows Iran’s deadly technology is increasing across the region.
