US reportedly threatens to halt all Israeli planes landing in America

i24NEWS

Israel's El Al Airlines Boeing 737 are pictured on the tarmac at Ben Gurion International Airport near Tel Aviv, on March 10, 2020.

AFP / JACK GUEZIsrael’s El Al Airlines Boeing 737 are pictured on the tarmac at Ben Gurion International Airport near Tel Aviv, on March 10, 2020.

Israel’s Foreign Ministry, however, denied any threats were being levied against the Jewish state

Threats to stop all Israeli planes from landing on American soil have been communicated to Jerusalem after the US accused the Jewish state of failing to live up to its aviation agreements, according to local broadcaster Channel 12.

The White House is reportedly accusing Jerusalem of creating a diplomatic crisis by not honoring an equal treatment agreement between Israeli and American airlines after Ben Gurion Airport shuttered all air traffic to prevent the spread of COVID-19 variants in the country. 

The Foreign Ministry, however, denied that they were aware of any threats being made by the US, according to The Jerusalem Post.

The Post also reported that the US Department of Transportation filed an official complaint last week to its Israeli counterpart after the Jewish state’s national carrier, El Al, was granted an exception to continue flying into Israel despite the border closure.

El Al has continued to operate emergency flights after winning a bid with Israel’s Civil Aviation Authority, while competitor Israir has been operating rescue flights for stranded Israelis abroad to and from Frankfurt. 

All flight carriers, with the exception of EL AL, have been barred from entering the US, according to Channel 12.

Comments


Tehran, under a law passed in December, is set to stop allowing inspections by the International Atomic Energy Agency on February 21

 

Left: US President-elect Joe Biden on January 14, 2021, in Wilmington, Delaware (AP Photo/Matt Slocum); Right: Iranian President Hassan Rouhani speaks in a meeting in Tehran, Iran, December 9, 2020. (Iranian Presidency Office via AP)

Left: US President-elect Joe Biden on January 14, 2021, in Wilmington, Delaware (AP Photo/Matt Slocum); Right: Iranian President Hassan Rouhani speaks in a meeting in Tehran, Iran, December 9, 2020. (Iranian Presidency Office via AP)

WASHINGTON — US President Joe Biden ran supporting a return to diplomacy with Iran but made clear he will not be rushed into re-entering a 2015 nuclear deal trashed by Donald Trump.

Nonetheless, a series of dates are coming up that will force the new US administration to show its hand.

What dates are coming up?

The Biden administration has repeatedly said it will return to full compliance with the deal, formally known as the Joint Comprehensive Agreement Plan of Action (JCPOA), once Iran does.

In other words, Biden will lift sanctions imposed by Trump only after the clerical regime reverses nuclear steps it took.

Iran, likely mindful of the widespread hostility it faces in Washington, wants to ensure an end to sanctions before it backs down on steps away from the nuclear commitments, which included enriching uranium to just a short technical step from weapons-grade levels.

In this Feb. 3, 2007 file photo, a technician works at the Uranium Conversion Facility just outside the city of Isfahan, Iran. (AP Photo/Vahid Salemi, File)

A key date comes on February 21 when Iran, under a law passed in December by the conservative-led parliament, is set to stop allowing inspections by the International Atomic Energy Agency unless there is an easing of US sanctions.

Kelsey Davenport, director for nonproliferation policy at the Arms Control Association in Washington, said that Iran can quickly undo most steps such as uranium enrichment.

“But the steps that are coming, I think, do pose a more significant risk and are more difficult to reverse,” she said.

While Iran has stopped short of threatening to expel IAEA inspectors, Davenport worried that any loss of access would fuel speculation that Tehran is engaged in illicit activities.

The risk “underscores the importance of restoring full compliance with the JCPOA before Iran takes these steps and develops this new knowledge,” she said.

An Iranian technician walks through the Uranium Conversion Facility just outside the city of Isfahan 255 miles (410 kilometers) south of the capital Tehran, Iran, February 3, 2007. (Vahid Salemi/AP)

Another key date is in June when Iran holds elections that could bring to power a hardliner to succeed President Hassan Rouhani, who bet on engagement with the West when Barack Obama was president only to see tensions soar under Trump.

With February 21 fast approaching, “it is imperative that diplomacy happens,” a former European Union diplomat said.

“The next 10 days will be important to give us an idea of what is occurring and how successful it will be” in persuading Iran to step back, the diplomat said.

“The entire issue is to make sure that the threshold is not crossed on that date,” said another European diplomat.

The diplomat said that position was shared by Russia and China, which are also signatories to the JCPOA but enjoy much closer relations with Iran than Western powers.

Jon Wolfsthal, who advised Biden when he was Obama’s vice president, said that the United States and Iran, along with other JCPOA nations, could issue a statement before February 21 “that would show their mutual intent to return to full compliance.”

Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei addresses the nation in Tehran, Iran, November 3, 2020. (Office of the Iranian Supreme Leader via AP)

But while action would be best as soon as possible, he doubted that decision-making would fundamentally change after the elections in Iran, where Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has final say.

“I don’t think the United States is going to say, Oh, we have to give away everything we have to do everything, because after June it’s impossible,” said Wolfsthal, now at the anti-nuclear weapon movement Global Zero.

 Will the US and Iran talk? 

State Department spokesman Ned Price reiterated Friday that the United States is “not looking at any particular deadline” when asked about February 21.

The Biden administration has named a special envoy on Iran, Rob Malley, one of the architects of the JCPOA.

Officially his first task has been coordination with the Europeans and he will only afterward revive US dialogue with Iran that was ended under Trump.

But one former adviser to Obama, speaking on condition of anonymity, said, “I suspect that US officials have already engaged with Iranian officials in some number of ways.”

What are the options? 

Thomas Countryman, who was a top arms control official in the Obama administration, said that Biden could immediately lift some sanctions to show good faith.

With help from the Europeans, the United States and Iran could also lay out the steps they will take, he said.

“Because of the domestic political situation in both countries, I think they’ve got to find a way to say, we did not give in to pressure,” Countryman said.

Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif listens during the talks in Moscow, Russia, January 26, 2021. (Russian Foreign Ministry Press Service via AP)

Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif has himself called for EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell to “choreograph” action between Washington and Tehran.

Other steps that the United States could take, observers say, could include offering Iran badly needed COVID-19 vaccines or dropping Trump-era objections to the International Monetary Fund lending money to Tehran to fight the pandemic.

Israel is pushing for a tougher renegotiated deal, and Biden has said he’ll consult with the Jewish state and his Gulf allies before taking steps to reenter the pact.


Iran nuclear deal: The 3 years versus 3 months dilemma

SECURITY AFFAIRS: Iran’s missiles against the US and Israel amid the next stage of the nuclear showdown

IRANIAN WOMEN hold pictures of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and the late Iranian Lt.-Gen. Qasem Soleimani, during the celebration of the 42nd anniversary of the Islamic Revolution, in Tehran on Wednesday. (photo credit: MAJID ASGARIPOUR/WANA (WEST ASIA NEWS AGENCY) VIA REUTERS)
IRANIAN WOMEN hold pictures of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and the late Iranian Lt.-Gen. Qasem Soleimani, during the celebration of the 42nd anniversary of the Islamic Revolution, in Tehran on Wednesday.
(photo credit: MAJID ASGARIPOUR/WANA (WEST ASIA NEWS AGENCY) VIA REUTERS)
 Iran’s satellite launch of the Zoljanah last week had nothing to do with Israel and everything to do with the US.

And that will also be how the test and the Islamic Republic’s ballistic missiles program ripple through the nuclear negotiations and in its future actions.
Along with that test, in recent media interviews by US President Joe Biden and US Secretary of State Antony Blinken, a press briefing by IDF Military Intelligence chief Maj. Gen. Tamir Heyman, multiple statements from Iranian officials and The Jerusalem Post’s consultation with Israeli defense sources – there is wide confirmation that the great divide on Iran between the US (and the EU-3) and Israel comes down to: the three years versus the three months dilemma.
The Islamic Republic may be three months away from threatening Israel with enough enriched material for a nuclear bomb, but is probably three years away from threatening the US, and a good deal more than three months from threatening the EU-3 (Germany, France and the UK).
Top arms control expert Jeffrey Lewis has recently estimated, both on Twitter and to the Post, that Tehran may be three years away from developing intercontinental ballistic missiles armed with a nuclear warhead which would have a long enough range to strike the US.
In contrast, a wide array of experts says that the ayatollahs may be as little as three months from having sufficient enriched uranium for a nuclear weapon, and they have had medium-range missiles that could reach Israel for decades.
Many experts said that Iran’s message from the timing of last week’s launch – as it engages in a public campaign vis-à-vis the US about resolving the nuclear standoff – was to show it would not stop its ballistic missile development program.