Macron says France could recognize Palestinian state in June

French President said that France could recognize a Palestinian state in June, adding that in turn some countries in the Middle East could recognize Israel.

France's President Emmanuel Macron holds a press conference at the 19th Summit of the Francophonie at the Grand Palais, Paris, Oct. 5, 2024.  (photo credit: Ludovic Marin / AFP via Getty Images)
France’s President Emmanuel Macron holds a press conference at the 19th Summit of the Francophonie at the Grand Palais, Paris, Oct. 5, 2024.
(photo credit: Ludovic Marin / AFP via Getty Images)
French President Emmanuel Macron said on Wednesday France could recognize a Palestinian state in June, adding that in turn some countries in the Middle East could recognize the state of Israel.

“We need to move towards recognition (of a Palestinian state). And so over the next few months, we will. I’m not doing it to please anyone. I’ll do it because at some point it will be right,” he said during a interview on France 5 television.

“And because I also want to take part in a collective dynamic that should also enable those who defend Palestine to recognize Israel in their turn, something that many of them are not doing.”

Most major Wester powers don’t recognize Palestine as state

Even though Palestine has been recognized as a sovereign state by almost 150 countries, most major Western powers have not, including the United States, Britain, France, Germany and Japan.

French President Emmanuel Macron (R) and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas deliver a press statement after a meeting at the Elysee Palace in Paris, France, December 22, 2017. (credit: REUTERS)Enlrage image
French President Emmanuel Macron (R) and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas deliver a press statement after a meeting at the Elysee Palace in Paris, France, December 22, 2017. (credit: REUTERS)

Among countries that do not recognize Israel are Saudi Arabia, Iran, Iraq, Syria and Yemen.

“Our objective is somewhere in June, with Saudi Arabia, to chair this conference where we could finalize the movement towards reciprocal recognition by several countries,” Macron said.


Trump says that Israel would lead military action to thwart Iran’s nuclear program, should such action be required.

US President Donald Trump said on Wednesday that, if military action is required to thwart Iran’s nuclear program, Israel will be involved and even lead the effort.

“With Iran, if it requires military, we’re going to have military. Israel will be the leader of that. But nobody leads us, we do what we want to do,” Trump told reporters at the Oval Office.

Asked what his deadline would be for Iran to reach a deal, the President replied, “I can’t really be specific, but when you start talks, you know if they’re going along well or not, and I would say the conclusion would be when I think they’re not going along well.”

Trump has repeatedly said that he would prefer to reach a deal with Iran rather than have to attack its nuclear facilities, but has left the military option on the table.

Trump announced on Monday, during a meeting with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, that the US would hold direct talks with Iran on its nuclear program over the weekend.

Despite the US President’s claims that the talks would be direct, Iranian officials said the encounter would involve indirect engagement rather than face-to-face talks.

Iran recently rejected Trump’s offer for direct talks, as outlined in a letter sent by the President to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

Trump then warned that “bad things” would happen to Iran if it does not agree to a deal on its nuclear program.

Later, the President warned Iran that “if they don’t make a deal, there will be bombing — and it will be bombing the likes of which they have never seen before.”

 

 


Iran has delivered advanced long-range missiles to militias in Iraq for the first time, heightening regional tensions as nuclear negotiations with the US loom.

Shiite militia in Iraq

Shiite militia in IraqReuters

For the first time, Iran has equipped its proxy forces in Iraq with long-range surface-to-surface missiles, a move that significantly expands the Islamic Republic’s military influence in the region, the British Times newspaper reported on Tuesday.

The development comes as Tehran prepares for direct negotiations with the United States regarding its nuclear and missile programs.

According to intelligence sources closely monitoring cross-border activities between Iran and Iraq, the missiles were delivered last week under the coordination of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps’ Aerospace Force.

This marks the first instance where Tehran has handed over such weapons to militias operating within Iraq, raising fresh concerns over Iran’s intentions as it faces growing international scrutiny.

The shipment, which included other munitions such as the Quds 351 cruise missiles and Jamal 69 short-range ballistic missiles, signals a sharp escalation by the regime. While these two missile types are more limited in range, the newly supplied long-range systems have the capability to threaten targets far beyond the Middle East.

“Iran has recently transferred missiles to Shia militias in Iraq, including new models with longer range, which have not been given in the past to those militias. It’s a desperate move by the Iranians, risking the stability of Iraq,” a regional intelligence source confirmed to the Times.

This military reinforcement appears to contradict recent claims from Iraqi officials suggesting that Iranian-aligned groups were preparing to disarm.

Reuters reported earlier this week that multiple Iran-aligned militias operating in Iraq are ready to lay down their arms in an attempt to prevent further confrontation with the United States.

Sources quoted in the report, including six militia leaders and government officials, indicated that the groups’ willingness to de-escalate stems from repeated, stern warnings issued by Washington since the beginning of Donald Trump’s presidency in January. The US had made it clear to Iraqi authorities that failure to rein in these factions could prompt American airstrikes on their positions.

Last month, it was reported that Esmail Qaani, commander of Iran’s Quds Force, has instructed leaders of Iran-backed armed groups in Iraq to refrain from responding to threats from the United States and Israel.

A regional diplomatic source, speaking to The Times, dismissed these disarmament efforts as a façade. “The efforts seen in the last 48 hours to create a picture that the militias are disarming is a ruse,” the source stated.