Report: Iran mulling interim nuclear deal with US

Axios reports Iran may seek an interim nuclear agreement with the US to buy time and reduce tensions with Washington.

Nuclear Iran

Nuclear IraniStock

Tehran is considering proposing an interim nuclear agreement with Washington as a preliminary step toward a broader, long-term accord, Axios reported on Thursday, citing a European diplomat and a source familiar with the deliberations.

The initiative comes amid heightened pressure from the White House, where President Donald Trump has set a two-month timeline for securing a new nuclear agreement with Iran. In parallel, the US has deployed additional military assets to the Middle East, signaling that it is preparing for alternative scenarios should diplomacy fall short.

In the absence of progress, the president may opt for a military strike against Iran’s nuclear infrastructure—or endorse such an operation by Israel.

Sources familiar with the Iranian approach told Axios that officials in Tehran view the prospect of finalizing a comprehensive and technically complex deal within Trump’s timeframe as implausible. Their aim appears to be securing more time to prevent a rapid escalation.

Ali Vaez, director of the Iran Project at the International Crisis Group, told Axios, “The Iranians seem to believe that a sustainable deal is unlikely to be achieved in the timeframe that President Trump has in mind. It might therefore be necessary to consider an interim agreement as a way station toward a final deal.”

The Iranian Mission to the United Nations declined to comment on the matter.

According to Axios, an interim agreement could entail temporary concessions such as scaling back uranium enrichment, diluting Iran’s 60% enriched uranium reserves, and granting enhanced access to international inspectors. Although these steps would only marginally extend the timeline for Iran’s potential development of a nuclear weapon, experts believe they could foster a climate more conducive to serious negotiations.

Such a proposal might also include extending the so-called “snapback” mechanism from the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), which allows for the automatic reimposition of UN sanctions in the event of non-compliance by Iran.

That provision is scheduled to expire in October. France, the United Kingdom, and Germany have already warned Tehran that they will trigger the snapback if no agreement is reached by the end of June.

However, any interim proposal would likely include a demand for the suspension of Trump’s “maximum pressure” campaign. The likelihood of the White House agreeing to such a request remains uncertain.

Some officials in Washington are concerned that an interim agreement could be used by Iran to stall negotiations while continuing its nuclear activities. This suspicion may further complicate the administration’s willingness to engage, according to Axios.

The report comes ahead of a meeting in Muscat on Saturday with US Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff representing Washington and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi representing Tehran.

Despite Trump’s claims that the talks would be direct, Iranian officials said the encounter would involve indirect engagement rather than face-to-face talks.

On Wednesday, Trump told reporters that, if military action is required to thwart Iran’s nuclear program, Israel will be involved and even lead the effort.

Asked what his deadline would be for Iran to reach a deal, the President replied, “I can’t really be specific, but when you start talks, you know if they’re going along well or not, and I would say the conclusion would be when I think they’re not going along well.”


Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan reveals ongoing technical coordination with Israel to avoid direct conflict in Syrian airspace.

Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan

Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan FidanREUTERS/Murad Sezer

Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan acknowledged on Wednesday that Ankara has been engaging in operational-level coordination with Israel in Syria to avoid unintended military incidents, Reuters reported.

The comments follow a series of intensified Israeli airstrikes in Syria, which Israeli officials said were intended to prevent a planned Turkish takeover of the targeted area.

According to a Reuters report published last week, Turkish forces had surveyed multiple air bases within Syrian territory as part of preliminary plans for a potential joint defense initiative. Those same installations were later targeted in Israeli airstrikes.

“While we are conducting certain operations in Syria, there needs to be a deconfliction mechanism with Israel, which flies aircraft in that region, similar to mechanisms we have with the U.S. and Russia,” Fidan told CNN Turk on Wednesday.

He further explained that the dialogue is strictly technical. “There are technical contacts to prevent combat elements from misunderstanding each other,” he said, noting that teams on both sides engage “when needed.”

Fidan emphasized that the coordination does not reflect any broader diplomatic overtures toward normalization with Israel. “These talks are limited to deconfliction in Syria,” he stated.

Turkey has upped its criticism of Israel’s counterterrorism operations. Last week, the Turkish Foreign Ministry criticized Israel’s strikes against Hezbollah terrorist targets in Lebanon.

“These attacks have once again exposed Israel’s flagrant disregard for international law and its ongoing threat to the region’s security and stability. The international community must stand united against Israel’s efforts to create a perpetual state of conflict in the region,” it said.

In response, the Israeli Foreign Ministry said in a statement of its own, “While violently suppressing his own citizens and carrying out mass arrests of political opponents, [President Recep Tayyip] Erdogan presumes to preach lofty values to the international community.”

“In Erdogan’s Turkey, there is no justice, no law, and no freedom. Israel does not need Erdogan’s ridiculous moral sermons. Israel acts to defend itself and its citizens against real threats and actual attacks — and it will continue to do so,” it added.

Erdogan has increased his verbal attacks on Israel since the start of the war in Gaza on October 7, 2023. The two countries had been on track to restore strained ties before Hamas’ October 7 attack on Israel.

Last month, the Turkish President described Israel as a “terror state” after it launched surprise strikes on terrorist targets in the Gaza Strip.


Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian reiterates Tehran’s disinterest in nuclear weapons and invites American investment, signaling a potential policy shift.

Masoud Pezeshkian

Masoud PezeshkianReuters/Morteza Nikoubazl/NurPhoto

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian on Wednesday reiterated that his country has no intention of pursuing nuclear weapons and extended an unexpected invitation to American investors—remarks made just days before renewed diplomatic engagement with the United States, The Associated Press reports.

“We are not after a nuclear bomb,” Pezeshkian said in a speech delivered in Tehran. “You (in the West) have verified it 100 times. Do it 1,000 times again.”

Pezeshkian emphasized that Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei does not object to US economic participation in Iran. “His excellency has no opposition to investment by American investors in Iran,” he stated. “American investors: Come and invest.”

This tone contrasts sharply with Iran’s stance following the 2015 nuclear accord, when the country pursued deals such as the purchase of American aircraft but maintained tight restrictions on US corporate presence.

Iran has long insisted that its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes only and that it is not interested in a bomb, but has expanded its nuclear activities in recent years, following US President Trump’s decision to withdraw from the 2015 nuclear deal during his first term in office.

In its latest step to advance its nuclear program, Iran recently informed the IAEA of its intention to “significantly increase” its production of uranium enriched up to 60 percent.

Pezeshkian’s comments come ahead of scheduled indirect talks in Oman between Iran and the US this coming Saturday.

Despite the US President’s claims that the talks would be direct, Iranian officials said the encounter would involve indirect engagement rather than face-to-face talks.

Iran recently rejected Trump’s offer for direct talks, as outlined in a letter sent by the President to Khamenei.