Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan (R) and Syrian President Ahmad al-Sharaa (L) shake hands as they hold a joint press conference after their meeting at Presidential Complex in Ankara, Turkiye on February 4, 2025.  (photo credit: Mehmet Ali Ozcan/Anadolu via Getty Images)
Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan (R) and Syrian President Ahmad al-Sharaa (L) shake hands as they hold a joint press conference after their meeting at Presidential Complex in Ankara, Turkiye on February 4, 2025.
(photo credit: Mehmet Ali Ozcan/Anadolu via Getty Images)
“If a Turkish air base is established in Syria, it would undermine Israel’s freedom of operation,” an Israeli security source told reporters on Monday, adding, “This is a potential threat that we oppose.”

Israel’s concern that the Syrian government might allow Turkey to establish military bases within the country comes amid the growing cooperation between Ahmed al-Sharaa’s regime in Syria and the government of Turkish President Erdogan.

In recent weeks, Israel’s political-security leadership has held several discussions regarding concerns of deeper Turkish involvement within Syria itself, including the possibility that the Erdogan government would establish military bases there. In the years before the fall of Assad’s regime, Turkey and Erdogan supported and assisted the rebels led by al-Sharaa.

Since October 7, President Erdogan has extensively criticized Israel, including its decision to seize buffer zones within Syria. Over the weekend, Erdogan stated, “May Allah bring destruction and ruin upon Zionist Israel.”

The IDF struck military targets in the city of Palmyra and at the Tiyas Air Base in central Syria on March 22, 2025 (credit: IDF Spokesperson’s Unit)

Israel’s operational freedom in Syria

The general concern in Israel is that al-Sharaa, the Syrian leader, will try to undermine Israel’s freedom of operation in the country.

“We targeted the military T4 base recently to send a message that we will not allow harm to our air freedom of operation,” said the security source.

The base, located deep within Syria, was attacked at the end of March. During the strike, weapons and strategic capabilities at the military airbases were destroyed.

Regarding the Syrian leader himself and whether he is someone with whom dialogue could be established, the security source clarified: “He is a classic Islamist. He has both short-term and long-term goals. His long-term goals have not changed; he is our enemy. He is working to lift sanctions on Syria, and Erdogan is also mediating in this regard. Without the removal of sanctions, he will meet the same fate as Assad.”


Is Egypt preparing for war in the Sinai Desert?

Large presence of Egyptian troops, military activity in the Sinai constitute violation of peace agreement with Israel, says security source.

By World Israel News Staff

The Egyptian military has bolstered its presence in the Sinai Desert bordering Israel in recent months, leading some experts to question if the mass buildup marks a violation of Cairo’s peace treaty with the Jewish State.

According to the terms of the peace agreement, which was established in 1979, Egypt’s military deployment in the Sinai is restricted to a specific number of troops.

But according to a security source, Egypt’s recent actions in the region go beyond its allotted quota and may constitute a violation of the peace treaty.

“Egypt has deployed forces beyond the permitted [amount], expanded port facilities, and extended runways at airports,” the source told the Jerusalem Post, adding that these moves are outside the bounds of the agreement.

The official was quick to add that Egypt could be in compliance with the agreement once again, by simply reducing its troop presence in the Sinai.

However, “Israel will not accept the situation and will not tolerate violations from Cairo,” the official warned the Post.

According to the Post report, Israel is engaged in ongoing negotiations over the matter with both the U.S. and Egypt.

The official told the Post that at currently in discussions with both Cairo and Washington on the matter.

“Washington is responsible for upholding the peace agreement and must ensure it is implemented as written,” the official said.

So far, Israel has refrained from commenting publicly on Egypt’s actions in the Sinai, though the Israeli ambassador to the U.S. wrote a letter to the Trump administration expressing concern over the issue.

Ambassador Yechiel Leiter referred to the expanded Egyptian military presence in the region as “intolerable” in a February 2025 letter.

“For a long time, this issue was pushed aside, but it is continuing,” Leiter wrote. “This will be a topic we are going to put on the table – very soon and very firmly.”


Khamenei referred to Trump’s remarks that “If they don’t make a deal, there will be bombing…the likes of which they have never seen before.”

An illustrative image of US President Donald Trump and Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. (photo credit: SHUTTERSTOCK/REUTERS/CARLOS BARRIA/KHAMENEI.IR)
An illustrative image of US President Donald Trump and Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.
(photo credit: SHUTTERSTOCK/REUTERS/CARLOS BARRIA/KHAMENEI.IR)
Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said on Monday that the US would receive a strong blow if it acts on President Donald Trump’s threat of bombing if the country does not reach a new nuclear deal with Washington.

“The enmity from the US and Israel has always been there. They threaten to attack us, which we don’t think is very probable, but if they commit any mischief they will surely receive a strong reciprocal blow,” Khamenei said.

“And if they are thinking of causing sedition inside the country as in past years, the Iranian people themselves will deal with them,” he added.

This refers to Trump’s first remarks since Iran rejected direct negotiations with Washington last week, in which he told NBC News that US and Iranian officials were talking but did not elaborate.

“If they don’t make a deal, there will be bombing,” Trump said in the telephone interview. “It will be bombing the likes of which they have never seen before.”

 US President Donald Trump against backdrop of Iranian missile (illustration). (credit: Canva/DavorLovincic, Getty Images/Anna Moneymaker)Enlrage image
US President Donald Trump against backdrop of Iranian missile (illustration). (credit: Canva/DavorLovincic, Getty Images/Anna Moneymaker)

“There’s a chance that if they don’t make a deal, that I will do secondary tariffs on them like I did four years ago,” he added.

Iran sent a response through Oman to a letter from Trump urging Tehran to reach a new nuclear deal, saying its policy was to not engage in direct negotiations with the United States while under its maximum pressure campaign and military threats, Tehran’s foreign minister was quoted as saying on Thursday.

Indirect negotiations to continue?

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian reiterated the policy on Sunday. “Direct negotiations (with the US) have been rejected, but Iran has always been involved in indirect negotiations, and now too, the Supreme Leader has emphasized that indirect negotiations can still continue,” he said, referring to Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

“An open threat of ‘bombing’ by a head of state against Iran is a shocking affront to the very essence of international peace and security,” Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei tweeted on Monday.

“Violence breeds violence, peace begets peace. The US can choose the course and concede to consequences,” Baghaei continued.

In his first 2017-21 term, Trump withdrew the US from a 2015 deal between Iran and world powers that placed strict limits on Tehran’s disputed nuclear activities in exchange for sanctions relief. Trump also reimposed sweeping US sanctions.

Since then, Iran has far surpassed that deal’s limits on uranium enrichment.

Western powers accuse Iran of having a clandestine agenda to develop nuclear weapons capability by enriching uranium to a high level of fissile purity, above what they say is justifiable for a civilian atomic energy program. Tehran says its nuclear program is wholly for civilian energy purposes.