The study examined hundreds of opinion articles and columns published in the Saudi English-language press over the past year.

YOAV SHUSTER

DECEMBER 3, 2024 08:20
 Saudi Crown Prince, Mohammed bin Salman attends a virtual cabinet meeting from his office in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, May 28, 2024. (photo credit: SAUDI PRESS AGENCY/HANDOUT VIA REUTERS)
Saudi Crown Prince, Mohammed bin Salman attends a virtual cabinet meeting from his office in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, May 28, 2024.
(photo credit: SAUDI PRESS AGENCY/HANDOUT VIA REUTERS)

Public opinion in Saudi Arabia regarding the possibility of normalization with Israel is gradually shifting, according to a recent analysis conducted by experts from the Diane and Guilford Glazer Foundation Information and Consulting Center of the Jewish People Policy Institute (JPPI).

Using advanced AI tools, the study examined hundreds of opinion articles and columns published in the Saudi English-language press over the past year. These articles were featured in major Saudi media outlets, such as Asharq Al-Awsat, Arab News, the Saudi Gazette, and others.

The study utilized thousands of press articles, from which opinion and commentary pieces were filtered using features in the LexisNexis database, along with the assistance of AI tools.

Researchers then employed advanced AI tools to analyze the following questions: What is the tone toward Israel in the article? To what extent is the topic of normalization mentioned? And if it is mentioned, what is the attitude toward normalization?

 A graph showing stance on Israel in Saudi media. (credit: via walla!)

A graph showing stance on Israel in Saudi media. (credit: via walla!)

The research showed that a vast majority of the examined media pieces have a negative or highly negative tone toward Israel, with almost no articles portraying Israel in a positive light.

 A graph showing stance on normalization with Israel in Saudi media. (credit: via walla!)

A graph showing stance on normalization with Israel in Saudi media. (credit: via walla!)

However, when analyzing Saudi attitudes toward normalization with Israel, a different picture was revealed.

In the opinion columns and articles that mentioned the topic of normalization, the computerized analysis found that, overall, the normalization process between Israel and Saudi Arabia was referenced in a fairly neutral and balanced manner.

A directive from the Saudi leadership

This stance toward normalization was evident despite the generally highly negative tone toward Israel.

The balanced tone toward the idea of normalization in a country like Saudi Arabia, where the media operates under the monarchy’s authority, led researchers to conclude that this neutral approach likely reflected a directive from the Saudi leadership.

Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman has long been working to persuade pockets of opposition within Saudi Arabia to support the idea of formalizing relations with Israel while simultaneously maintaining his image as someone who has not abandoned the Palestinian cause.


“The Iranians have paid a very high price for operating all their proxies against Israel over the past year,” explained Sabati.

 IRAN’S SUPREME Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei attends Friday prayers and a memorial ceremony for Hassan Nasrallah in Tehran earlier this month. (photo credit: Office of the Iranian Supreme Leader/West Asia News Agency/Reuters)
IRAN’S SUPREME Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei attends Friday prayers and a memorial ceremony for Hassan Nasrallah in Tehran earlier this month.
(photo credit: Office of the Iranian Supreme Leader/West Asia News Agency/Reuters)
The surprising offensive by Sunni rebels in Syria reveals a deep crisis in Iran’s strategy, Institute for National Security Studies researcher Benny Sabati said in a recent interview with Maariv, arguing that Tehran’s efforts in combatting Israel left the Islamic Republic depleted.

“The Iranians have paid a very high price for operating all their proxies against Israel over the past year,” explained Sabati.

Iran finds itself significantly weakened

“Their command has been eliminated, their soldiers and field commanders – many of whom are in Hezbollah, Hamas, and other groups,” Sabati noted. As a result, “Iran is entering the campaign in Syria in a very weak state; it has no means to help Assad’s regime at all.”

This double blow is not only about the inability to provide assistance but also about inflicting harm.

“They targeted a general and several IRGC members, killed them, and captured the Iranian consulate. On one hand, Iran is unable to assist; on the other, it has become a target itself.”

 Members of Syrian opposition fighters walk along a street in Aleppo, after the Syrian army said that dozens of its soldiers had been killed in a major attack by rebels who swept into the city, in Syria November 30, 2024. (credit: REUTERS/MAHMOUD HASSANO)Enlrage image
Members of Syrian opposition fighters walk along a street in Aleppo, after the Syrian army said that dozens of its soldiers had been killed in a major attack by rebels who swept into the city, in Syria November 30, 2024. (credit: REUTERS/MAHMOUD HASSANO)

Struggling with parallel fronts

According to Sabati, Iran’s problem is compounded by its inability to manage simultaneous fronts.

“The Iranians have an issue. They neither like nor believe in fighting on two fronts. When they’re focused on the Israeli front, that’s all they deal with,” Sabati said.

“They likely had to neglect this front of the extremist Sunnis,” Sabati added. “They’ve abandoned it for the past two or three years in favor of focusing on Israel.”

The consequences of this neglect are now becoming evident, the researcher argued.

“Now the genie is out of the bottle.”

Turning to Russia for help

In search of a solution, Iran turned to Russia, he continued. “Iran’s foreign minister spoke last night with Russia’s foreign minister, asking for help.”

However, even the Iranian foreign minister’s visit to Damascus seemed futile, Sabati added.

“He can come to encourage – that’s all he can do. They don’t have much in their pocket.”

Domestic criticism and regional implications

The situation is escalating amid internal criticism in Iran, as “the public is very angry about the aid provided to regional countries and all the terrorist organizations,” said Sabati.

Meanwhile, the regional implications largely depend on Russia’s response.

“If the Russians intervene and suppress this rebellion, it’s a different story. If they don’t, we will witness a significant weakening of both Iran and the Syrian regime.”


The weapons may include missiles, production and storage facilities of chemical weapons like sarin, tanks, and armored personnel carriers.

 Rebels fire at the Syrian military on the outskirts of Aleppo in Syria. November 29, 2024.  (photo credit: BAKR ALKASEM/AFP via Getty Images)
Rebels fire at the Syrian military on the outskirts of Aleppo in Syria. November 29, 2024.
(photo credit: BAKR ALKASEM/AFP via Getty Images)
Israel’s security establishment has raised concerns that Syrian rebels may seize strategic rebels in the Aleppo area after the rebel groups entered the city last week and forced President Bashar al-Assad’s regime to flee.

Such weapons may include missiles, production and storage facilities of chemical weapons like sarin, tanks, armored personnel carriers, and aircraft at bases in the Aleppo area and its surroundings.

In addition to stockpiles of light weapons, shoulder-fired missiles, vehicles, and various types of ammunition, the area contains infrastructure sites for the production of weapons such as rockets, precision missiles, and other armaments, some of which are manufactured for Hezbollah and pro-Iranian Shiite militias.

These production sites are designed to complicate IDF operations targeting the smuggling of weapons from Iran to Syria and from there to Beirut.

The rebels are mostly from organizations rooted in al-Qaeda.

 A Syrian rebel carries a weapon as he stands at the entrance of Saraqeb town in northwestern Idlib province, Syria. December 1, 2024. (credit: REUTERS/MAHMOUD HASSANO)Enlrage image
A Syrian rebel carries a weapon as he stands at the entrance of Saraqeb town in northwestern Idlib province, Syria. December 1, 2024. (credit: REUTERS/MAHMOUD HASSANO)

In the short term, they are focused on opposing the Assad regime. However, the defense establishment fears that once they consolidate control over the area, they may turn their intentions and firepower toward the Israeli home front.

The weapons that might fall into their hands, combined with their extremist ideology, could threaten Israel’s security interests, necessitating constant vigilance.

Iran’s involvement

Another highly dangerous development for Israel is Iran’s involvement, which is currently striving to suppress the rebellion led by the rebels against the Assad regime.

Further, Iranian success in the Syrian arena could bolster its influence over the Syrian regime.

Recently, however, there have been growing calls among moderate Sunni states urging Assad to break away from the “Axis of Evil,” rejoin the Arab League, and benefit from investments that could help rehabilitate his regime and Syria.