Burns detailed the “hellish” conditions that the hostages are facing in Gaza on NPR’s ‘All Things Considered.’

JERUSALEM POST STAFF

JANUARY 11, 2025 04:00
Updated: JANUARY 11, 2025 04:07
 CIA Director William J. Burns departs a classified briefing with members of Congress on Capitol Hill in Washington, US, January 30, 2024. (photo credit: REUTERS/Nathan Howard)
CIA Director William J. Burns departs a classified briefing with members of Congress on Capitol Hill in Washington, US, January 30, 2024.
(photo credit: REUTERS/Nathan Howard)

The White House is working under the belief that a deal to get hostages out of “hellish” conditions in Gaza can be achieved by President-elect Trump’s inauguration day, CIA Director William Burns told NPR on Friday.

Burns said that current negotiations between Israel and Hamas, brokered by the US and its regional partners, were “quite serious” and could possibly be wrapped up “within the next couple of weeks.”

“I do think there remains a chance to get a deal,” Burns told NPR’s Mary Louise Kelley. “This administration worked very hard at that right up until January 20. I think the coordination with the new administration on this issue has been good. President-elect Trump has made clear his interest in trying to get a deal, you know, before his inauguration.”

Trump, who will be inaugurated on January 20, previously said: “If the hostages are not back by the time I’m in office, all hell will break out in the Middle East, and it will not be good for Hamas, and it will not be good, frankly, for anyone.”

Burns went on to state that he believed that gaps in demands between Israel and Hamas had narrowed but that the ceasefire was about more than military logistics.

 Einav Zangauker, mother of hostage Matan Zangauker, among demonstrators calling for a hostage deal, December 14, 2024. (credit: AVSHALOM SASSONI/MAARIV)

Einav Zangauker, mother of hostage Matan Zangauker, among demonstrators calling for a hostage deal, December 14, 2024. (credit: AVSHALOM SASSONI/MAARIV)

Is the deal progressing?

“It’s about human beings. It’s about hostages held in hellish conditions, you know, in tunnels beneath Gaza,” Burns said. “It’s about their families with whom I meet regularly, which is a heartbreaking experience. And I have nothing but admiration for their bravery and determination.”

Burns also noted that Gazan civilians were also “suffering terribly, especially through this winter.”

The CIA director’s interview on All Things Considered comes in the middle of hostage negotiations. A source familiar with the matter told The Jerusalem Post on Sunday that negotiations were “progressing slowly” and that there has not been a general enough consensus to send Mossad Director David Barnea to Qatar.

“There’s every reason for political leaders to recognize that enough is enough,” Burns said. “Perfect is rarely on the menu in the Middle East, and, you know, it’s time to make a deal.

Reuters reported earlier this week that Hamas had released a list of 34 hostages to be exchanged in a potential deal. The Prime Minister’s Office denied the reports and told the Post that Israel had not received “any list from Hamas regarding the hostages; we don’t know which hostages are alive or what their conditions are.”

Earlier on Friday, National Security Communications Advisor John Kirby told reporters that Hamas was “making it difficult,” hence why there is no hostage deal. He did not give further updates other than that the White House was “working on this really, really hard.”

Burns on Iran

The director also noted that the Iranian regime had made significant strategic blunders over the last six months.

“Its’ strategic position has suffered considerably over the course of the last six or seven months,” Burns said. “Two failed efforts to launch significant ballistic missile strikes against Israel, the collapse of its leading proxy, Hezbollah in Lebanon, the severe degradation of Hamas in Gaza, and then the fall of the Assad regime in Syria. All of that, I think, strategically puts the Iranian regime in a much weaker position.”

He further noted that Iran could reverse the 2003 decision to suspend its weapons program but that the US does not “see any sign today that any such decision has been made, but we obviously watch it intently.”

“That sense of weakness could also theoretically create a possibility for serious negotiations, too,” he noted.

Amichai Stein and Hannah Sarisohn contributed to this report.


Iran’s top general in Syria, Behrouz Esbati, admits Iran suffered a significant defeat in Syria but stresses it would continue its efforts in the region.

Syrians celebrate end of Assad regime

Syrians celebrate end of Assad regimeREUTERS/Annegret Hilse

Iran’s top general in Syria has openly contradicted Tehran’s official stance on the sudden fall of its ally Bashar Al-Assad, admitting in a remarkably forthright speech last week that Iran had suffered a significant defeat but would continue its efforts in the region, The New York Times reported on Wednesday.

An audio recording of Brig. Gen. Behrouz Esbati’s speech at a mosque in Tehran was leaked on Monday, drawing sharp contrast with statements from Iran’s President, Foreign Minister, and other top officials, who have downplayed the scale of Iran’s strategic loss in Syria.

Since Syrian rebels ousted Assad last month, Iranian leaders have repeatedly emphasized their willingness to honor Syria’s people’s political decisions.

But General Esbati stated in the leaked audio, “I don’t consider losing Syria something to be proud of. We were defeated, and defeated very badly, we took a very big blow and it’s been very difficult.”

Esbati disclosed that relations between Iran and Assad had been strained for months before his ouster. He claimed that the Syrian leader repeatedly refused Iran’s requests to launch an offensive against Israel from Syrian territory following the Hamas attack on October 7, 2023.

Iran had reportedly shared detailed military plans with Assad, outlining how its forces in Syria could strike Israel, but the Syrian leader resisted.

The general also accused Russia, ostensibly an ally, of misleading Iran by falsely claiming its strikes were targeting Syrian rebels when, in fact, they were bombing empty fields. Additionally, he alleged that Russia “turned off radars,” enabling Israeli strikes on Iranian assets in Syria over the past year.

Iran had previously provided military support to Syrian government forces through more than a decade of civil war.

Near the start of the Syrian civil war, it was reported that then-Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad had personally sanctioned the dispatch of officers from the Iranian Revolutionary Guards to Syria to fight alongside Assad’s troops.

Ali Akbar Velayati, a top aide to Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, made clear several years ago that Iran would withdraw its “military advisers” from Syria and Iraq only if their governments wanted it to.

Iran’s then-President Ebrahim Raisi visited Damascus last year and headed a “high economic-political delegation”.

However, Iran reportedly reduced its military footprint in Syria in recent months, following a succession of strikes blamed on Israel.

With a coalition of rebels taking over most of Syria and forming a new government, General Esbati expressed in his remarks Iran’s intent to adapt its strategy.

“We can activate all the networks we have worked with over the years,” he said, as quoted by The New York Times. “We can activate the social layers that our guys lived among for years; we can be active in social media and we can form resistance cells.”

When asked whether Iran would retaliate for Israel’s elimination of Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah, General Esbati said Iran already had, referring to missile strikes last fall. On the possibility of further attacks on Israel, he admitted, “the situation” currently does not allow for such actions.

Responding to a question about targeting US bases, he warned that doing so would provoke overwhelming retaliation, adding that Iran’s regular missiles lack the sophistication to penetrate advanced US defense systems.

Despite these sobering admissions, General Esbati sought to reassure the audience, claiming that Iran and its allies still hold an upper hand in the region.


Report: Israel considering dividing Syria into provinces

One of the plans for guaranteeing the security of each ethnic group in Syria involves dividing the country into smaller, self-governing provinces.

Israeli forces in Syria

Israeli forces in SyriaIDF

Defense Minister Israel Katz recently held a meeting with other cabinet officials to discuss development in Syria, with emphasis on Turkish involvement.

According to Israel Hayom, Cabinet member Eli Cohen proposed promoting an international conference on Syria. The conference would give the option to reshape Syria’s borders in light of the fall of the Assad regime.

Such a conference cause also conceivably results in Syria being dissolved into smaller provinces divided between the different ethnic groups in the country, allowing each a degree of security and self-governance.