“…under the peace plan that we released, that comes with a commitment to set aside a certain area of land for the eventual, potential Palestinian state,” said President Trump’s former envoy to the Middle East peace negotiations Jason Greenblatt in an interview with Israel’s Army radio.

Greenblatt was one of the architects of the Trump peace plan which was introduced officially in late January.

Despite Israel having to designate and allocate land in advance for a Palestinian state, Greenblatt said, the Palestinian Authority would need need to meet the plan’s criteria for making a state, “There’s a lot of criteria before the Palestinians become a state, if it ever happens. I think that’s what differentiates the plan we released from some of the past efforts. There are things that have to be solved before you begin a discussion on what a Palestinian state should look like.”

Greenblatt said that in his estimation, Israel would not implement sovereignty without coordinating it with the US administration.

“The peace plan that we released back in January does contemplate the application of Israeli law, and I’m sure that once the Israeli government decides what it wants to do, it will do it in coordination with the White House, which I think is the right approach.”,” he said.

Regarding the delays in implementing the plan or applying sovereignty, Greenblatt said, “The peace effort during the next couple of months is going to be extremely challenging obviously, with COVID and the economic crisis, and the Palestinian leadership rejecting the Trump peace plan even before it was released. It’s a bumpy road, but nothing has ever been smooth on the peace file, and I think we have to just keep trying. I hope the White House and Israeli government keep trying, and I hope the Palestinian leadership comes to its senses, because I think the plan we presented is a realistic and implementable plan.” Greenblatt said.

The interview can be heard on GLZ.

Greenblatt: Israeli Sovereignty Only with Allocating Land for Palestinian State


Move comes after terror group accused Israel of killing one of its fighters in an airstrike outside Damascus earlier in the week

 

Israeli soldiers stand near artillery cannons deployed along the Lebanese border outside the northern Israeli town of Kiryat Shmona on September 1, 2019. (Basel Awidat/Flash90)

Israeli soldiers stand near artillery cannons deployed along the Lebanese border outside the northern Israeli town of Kiryat Shmona on September 1, 2019. (Basel Awidat/Flash90)

The Israel Defense Forces on Thursday announced it was sending reinforcements to the northern border amid the threat of retaliation by the Lebanese Hezbollah terror group over the death of one of its fighters in Syria earlier this week.

“In light of a situational assessment that was held in the IDF, it was decided to send a pinpoint reinforcement of infantry troops to the Northern Command,” the military said.

Also on Thursday, sources close to Hezbollah told the London-based Asharq al-Awsat newspaper that the terror group would likely respond to the death of its fighter on Monday night.

An IDF spokesperson said the reinforcement consisted of one battalion — the Golani Brigade’s 13th Battalion — and a small number of additional troops, who were being sent to the Northern Command’s Galilee Division.

Ali Kamel Mohsen Jawad, a member of the Hezbollah terror group, whom the organization says was killed in an Israeli airstrike on July 20, 2020. (Hezbollah media)

The move came two days after Hezbollah accused Israel of killing one of its members — Ali Kamel Mohsen Jawad — in an airstrike south of Damascus on Monday night, raising the possibility of retaliation against the Jewish state.

In response to the terror group’s announcement about Jawad’s death, both the IDF and Hezbollah went on high alert along the frontier, according to media reports from both sides of the border.

In the past, Hezbollah has retaliated for confirmed deaths of its members at Israel’s hands with attacks on the Jewish state, generally along the Israeli-Lebanese border. As a result of this policy, the IDF generally refrains from killing Hezbollah troops in Syria.

Such an exchange occurred last August, when the IDF killed two Hezbollah members that the military said were taking part in an Iranian-run operation in southern Syria that attempted to attack IDF border positions with armed drones.

“If Israel kills any of our members in Syria, we’ll respond from Lebanon and not in the Shebaa Farms, and we tell the Israeli army on the border to be very cautious and to wait for us,” Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah said in a speech at the time.

A location near the northern Israeli town of Avivim shows the site where an anti-tank missile fired by Hezbollah fighters hit a road on September 1, 2019, seen on September 10, 2019. (Judah Ari Gross/Times of Israel)

Days later, in response to their deaths — as well as an alleged Israeli drone attack in Beirut that occurred the same night — Hezbollah fired three anti-tank guided missiles at Israeli military targets along the Lebanese border, narrowly missing an IDF armored ambulance in with five soldiers inside.

On Thursday, sources “familiar with [Hezbollah’s] views” told Asharq Al-Awsat that the terror group was abiding by that same “equation that Nasrallah set last year” of retaliating when one of its fighters is killed in Syria.

The airstrike attributed to Israel on Monday night hit weapons depots and military positions belonging to Syrian regime forces and Iran-backed militia fighters, according to the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights.

The group said the aerial bombardments caused several explosions around the town of Kiswah, an area that has long been associated with Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.

The attack reportedly came in two waves. The Reuters news service reported that the assault hit targets in the towns of Jabal al Mane, Muqaylabiya and Zakiya, causing “huge blasts” and allegedly killing Iranian personnel.

Syrian Air defenses respond to alleged Israeli missiles targeting south of the capital Damascus, on July 20, 2020 (AFP)

Reuters quoted a Syrian analyst with sources on the ground named Zaid al Reys as saying that the target of the attack was a “major ammunition depot.”

Israel has launched hundreds of strikes in Syria since the start of the civil war in 2011. It has targeted government troops, allied Iranian forces and fighters from the Lebanese Shiite terror group Hezbollah.

It rarely confirms details of its operations in Syria, but says Iran’s presence in support of President Bashar Assad and Hezbollah is a threat and that it will continue its strikes.

Monday’s attack came a week and a half after Iran and Syria signed an agreement that would see Tehran upgrade the Syrian military’s air defenses, apparently in response to ongoing Israeli strikes in the country.

It was the first strike in Syria to be attributed to Israel since June, when the Observatory said nine fighters were killed in airstrikes targeting positions of Iran-backed militias near the Iraqi border. Those strikes came hours after a similar raid killed six other Tehran-backed fighters.

Times of Israel staff and AFP contributed to this report.

IDF sends reinforcements to north amid threat of Hezbollah attack


From tax evasion to hidey-holes, IAA excavation director Yardenna Alexandre discusses Jewish life in the small village where Jesus grew up

Nazareth may be best known for its famous ancient resident — Jesus — but as British-Israeli archaeologist Yardenna Alexandre notes in this week’s The Times of Israel Podcast, the once small village with huge name recognition existed well before and well after his lifetime.

Alexandre discusses what archaeology tells us about the Jews who lived in Nazareth and its surroundings two millennia ago, and how by hewing into the soft chalk stone under the village houses the residents evaded taxes, and also may have saved their skins during the Great Revolt against the Romans in 66 CE.

Based on excavated evidence, the tiny, off-the-beaten-path hamlet was inhabited from the Iron Age (10th–8th centuries BCE) onward. It was only in the 1850s that the Europeans turned the one-camel town into a holy site, and the village turned into the sprawling modern Arab Israeli city we find today.

Alexandre published a new excavation report on Nazareth in the current issue of the Israel Antiquities Authority’s ‘Atiqot journal that describes its early settlement history and findings from her excavations and those of other researchers. What is arguably of most interest in the report is what was discovered in very bedrock of the village.

Among her digs, in 2009, Alexandre discovered the first example of a residential building from the time of Jesus. It was found near today’s Church of the Annunciation, which was constructed in 1969 on top of three earlier churches, including a 4th century CE structure. In her report, Alexandre describes the structure as “a simple house comprising small rooms and an inner courtyard was inhabited in the late Hellenistic and the Early Roman periods.” In earlier excavations on the site, some early Roman period storage pits and cisterns were also found.

The 2009 excavation of a 2,000-year-old Nazareth Jewish home, next to the Church of the Annunciation. (Assaf Peretz, courtesy of the Israel Antiquities Authority)

Catholic tradition believes the churches were built on the location of a cave that was thought to be the familial house of Mary, Jesus’s mother. According to New Testament tradition, the Angel Gabriel revealed to Mary (then an unmarried young woman) that she would become pregnant through the Holy Spirit and give birth to the Son of God. (The eventual birth took place in a little town of Bethlehem, where Mary’s husband Joseph had family.)

In a Times of Israel Podcast interview this week, Alexandre says that Jewish settlers came to the Galilee during a northward expansion of un-landed Hasmonean soldiers and others from the late Hellenistic to Early Roman periods (late second century BCE to early or mid-second century CE). Among these residents who arrived during the Judeans’ manifest destiny movement were presumably the family of Jesus’s mother Mary.

Salvaging knowledge ahead of development

Alexandre has been excavating sites in the Lower Galilee on behalf of the IAA for the past three decades. Born in London, she immigrated to Israel in 1980 and earned an MA in archaeology at Tel Aviv University before moving north.

As an archaeologist who is not affiliated with a research facility, Alexandre leads salvage excavations for the IAA to uncover artifacts and information prior to land development. In a crowded city such as Nazareth, the possibility of excavation is rare and comes up when, for example, an institution wishes to expand or a local business reinvents itself from a car garage to a luxury hotel.

“I go where I’m sent and create the story from the material that turns up. It’s quite exciting in a way because you never what what you’re going to land with,” said Alexandre.

Archaeologist Yardenna Alexandre next to a display of artifacts in Nazareth’s Legacy Hotel. (courtesy)

Today’s booming, packed Nazareth is not at all on the scale of the little village where Jesus was raised, she says.

“The Nazareth that we know today is really the result of the second half of the 19th century development onwards. Because it was only in about the 1850s that the Europeans began to develop their interest in Nazareth as a Holy City, a city holy to Christianity. All the main European powers started taking interest and they built churches and other institutions,” she said.

However, if we were to step back in time and visit Nazareth at the time of Jesus, we would see a very small village settled by a few families. Around Nazareth there were larger, important towns such as Tzippori (Sephoris), which was only about 5 kilometers to the west of Nazareth, as well as the village of Kana, near today’s Kfar Kana, which was 3-4 kilometers to the north from Nazareth.

An in situ image of stone vessels unearthed inside the ancient workshop at the stone quarry and tool production center excavations at Reina, a few kilometers from Nazareth, in Lower Galilee. (Samuel Magal/IAA)

Alexandre said that scant excavations in Nazareth have not uncovered any ritual baths or synagogues, but it was clearly a Jewish settlement due to the types of pottery found, as well as the chalk-stone vessels, which were only used by the Jewish populations of the era because they were not susceptible to ritual impurity.

“Jewish families would make sure they had several of the stone vessels in their cupboards,” she said. Along with the nod to Jewish law, or halacha, Alexandre and other excavators in the area have discovered numerous Herodian-style lamps of the sort found in Jerusalem.

“Petrographic analysis of the sherds have allowed us to come to the conclusion that the lamps from the Galilee were actually manufactured in Jerusalem,” she said, and were taken back to the tiny town as souvenirs from pilgrimages to Jerusalem and the Temple Mount.

IAA archaeologist Yardenna Alexandre in an underground system of rooms under ancient Nazareth. (Screenshot)

There are geographical, environmental explanations for Nazareth being so small, she said. Nazareth was set in a small basin surrounded by hills and wasn’t very accessible. It did have a water supply from what is called today Mary’s Well, and there is evidence of some limited terraced agriculture, as well as pasture fields. But since the town wasn’t located on a roadway, “people didn’t go through Nazareth unless they specifically wanted to go there. And that was really the reason that it remained a small site until the 19th century.”

Nazareth is the pits

While few remains of structures from the time of Jesus have been discovered, the most intriguing discoveries dating to the early Roman period is the proliferation of subterranean systems of rooms under ancient Nazareth that were hewn into the soft chalk bedrock.

The people who lived in Nazareth dug out pits for storage, and for other practical uses, she said, such as the production of wine, including treading grapes, and oil-pressing. Such storage pits have been found elsewhere in the Lower Galilee and Alexandre believes that the Jews eventually also used them for secreting their wares — aka tax evasion — and even themselves during the Great Revolt of 66 CE.

IAA archaeologist Yardenna Alexandre in an underground system of rooms under ancient Nazareth. (Screenshot)

“What we did find in Nazareth is a development of this kind of concept — not only did they dig individual pits for storage, but they dug below the pits, down to a second level, deeper down, and a third level, and often there were underground passages leading from one to another. So really in the times of danger or in times when people wanted to hide things, they would be able to do so,” she said.

In one site, Alexandre discovered a bell-shaped system of rooms that would have been connected. “The triple layer of pit that I found, each pit was about 1.7 meters [5.5 feet] and 1.5 meters [5 feet], so we’d be going down about 5 meters [16.5 feet] below ground,” she said.

In the times of danger or in times when people wanted to hide things, they would be able to do so

According to the pottery in the various excavations, the pits under Nazareth were in use from the Bronze or Iron Age on through the Byzantine era.

Alexandre believes they were enlarged and used as hiding spaces, “because we found finds that specifically date the use of these pits to the early Roman period, and even more specifically to the time of the Great Revolt.”

Among the artifacts is a coin of Emperor Claudius that was uncovered on the floor of a corridor that led into a three-story pit complex. According to the report, “The coin was minted in ‘Akko-Ptolemais in 50–51 CE. The coin provides support for the functioning of the complex in the latter half of the first century CE, possibly in the context of the preparations for the First Jewish–Roman War in 66–67 CE.”

Illustrative: A rare bronze Year Four coin, minted in 69-70 CE during the Great Jewish Revolt, discovered in wet sifting of material from the City of David, June 2018. (Ilan Shilmaiv/City of David)

In addition to artifacts supporting the subterranean system’s use for hiding are recorded documentation from the main Jewish commander in the Galilee Josephus, who became the era’s most well-known Jewish historian. Alexandre believes that the pits were used to shelter women, children and other non-fighting Jews.

“Not everybody went out to war, people had to protect themselves, and the people who were not fighting had to hide,” she said.

In the time of Jesus, residents of Nazareth likely only had the single storage units under their homes, Alexandre believes. It was only in the Great Revolt, she said, that they would have dug deeper for hiding places for themselves.

“What we did observe is that the first, the highest pits, were well carved, and the two below it were rather more hurriedly and slovenly created. The second and third layer down were added in time of danger,” she said.

These pits were found in other locations, such as nearby Kana, where Jesus and Mary attended a wedding that was recorded in the Christian New Testament. Alexandre also discovered ritual baths under private dwellings in this seemingly more affluent village that was likewise settled by Hasmonean Jews.

Illustration of subterranean silos found under Nazareth. (Courtesy/Screen shot)

In reference to Nazareth’s small stature, Alexandre quotes from the Book of John, in which Nathanael of Kana wonders to Philip, one of the 12 apostles, “Can anything good come out of Nazareth?”

“It was just a little hamlet, and the idea that such a leader [as Jesus] came out of Nazareth was surprising, was worth noting,” said Alexandre.

The Times of Israel podcasts are available for download on iTunes, Soundcloud, TuneIn, Pocket Casts, Stitcher, PlayerFM or wherever you get your podcasts.