Trump says that Israel would lead military action to thwart Iran’s nuclear program, should such action be required.

US President Donald Trump said on Wednesday that, if military action is required to thwart Iran’s nuclear program, Israel will be involved and even lead the effort.

“With Iran, if it requires military, we’re going to have military. Israel will be the leader of that. But nobody leads us, we do what we want to do,” Trump told reporters at the Oval Office.

Asked what his deadline would be for Iran to reach a deal, the President replied, “I can’t really be specific, but when you start talks, you know if they’re going along well or not, and I would say the conclusion would be when I think they’re not going along well.”

Trump has repeatedly said that he would prefer to reach a deal with Iran rather than have to attack its nuclear facilities, but has left the military option on the table.

Trump announced on Monday, during a meeting with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, that the US would hold direct talks with Iran on its nuclear program over the weekend.

Despite the US President’s claims that the talks would be direct, Iranian officials said the encounter would involve indirect engagement rather than face-to-face talks.

Iran recently rejected Trump’s offer for direct talks, as outlined in a letter sent by the President to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

Trump then warned that “bad things” would happen to Iran if it does not agree to a deal on its nuclear program.

Later, the President warned Iran that “if they don’t make a deal, there will be bombing — and it will be bombing the likes of which they have never seen before.”

 

 


Iran has delivered advanced long-range missiles to militias in Iraq for the first time, heightening regional tensions as nuclear negotiations with the US loom.

Shiite militia in Iraq

Shiite militia in IraqReuters

For the first time, Iran has equipped its proxy forces in Iraq with long-range surface-to-surface missiles, a move that significantly expands the Islamic Republic’s military influence in the region, the British Times newspaper reported on Tuesday.

The development comes as Tehran prepares for direct negotiations with the United States regarding its nuclear and missile programs.

According to intelligence sources closely monitoring cross-border activities between Iran and Iraq, the missiles were delivered last week under the coordination of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps’ Aerospace Force.

This marks the first instance where Tehran has handed over such weapons to militias operating within Iraq, raising fresh concerns over Iran’s intentions as it faces growing international scrutiny.

The shipment, which included other munitions such as the Quds 351 cruise missiles and Jamal 69 short-range ballistic missiles, signals a sharp escalation by the regime. While these two missile types are more limited in range, the newly supplied long-range systems have the capability to threaten targets far beyond the Middle East.

“Iran has recently transferred missiles to Shia militias in Iraq, including new models with longer range, which have not been given in the past to those militias. It’s a desperate move by the Iranians, risking the stability of Iraq,” a regional intelligence source confirmed to the Times.

This military reinforcement appears to contradict recent claims from Iraqi officials suggesting that Iranian-aligned groups were preparing to disarm.

Reuters reported earlier this week that multiple Iran-aligned militias operating in Iraq are ready to lay down their arms in an attempt to prevent further confrontation with the United States.

Sources quoted in the report, including six militia leaders and government officials, indicated that the groups’ willingness to de-escalate stems from repeated, stern warnings issued by Washington since the beginning of Donald Trump’s presidency in January. The US had made it clear to Iraqi authorities that failure to rein in these factions could prompt American airstrikes on their positions.

Last month, it was reported that Esmail Qaani, commander of Iran’s Quds Force, has instructed leaders of Iran-backed armed groups in Iraq to refrain from responding to threats from the United States and Israel.

A regional diplomatic source, speaking to The Times, dismissed these disarmament efforts as a façade. “The efforts seen in the last 48 hours to create a picture that the militias are disarming is a ruse,” the source stated.


Unnamed senior Hezbollah member tells Reuters that Israel must also ‘halts its aggression against Lebanese’ before Iran-backed terror group will hold talks on its arms caches

A Hezbollah member speaks on walkie-talkie during a funeral procession of Hezbollah's former leader, Hassan Nasrallah, and his cousin and successor, Hashem Safieddine at the burial site in Beirut's southern suburbs, Lebanon, February 23, 2025. (AP Photo/Bilal Hussein)

A Hezbollah member speaks on walkie-talkie during a funeral procession of Hezbollah’s former leader, Hassan Nasrallah, and his cousin and successor, Hashem Safieddine at the burial site in Beirut’s southern suburbs, Lebanon, February 23, 2025. (AP Photo/Bilal Hussein)

As calls for Lebanon’s Hezbollah to disarm gain momentum, a senior Hezbollah official told Reuters the terror group is ready to hold talks with the Lebanese president about its weapons if Israel withdraws from south Lebanon and stops its strikes.

US-backed President Joseph Aoun, who vowed when he took office in January to establish a state monopoly on the control of arms, intends to open talks with Hezbollah over its arsenal soon, three Lebanese political sources said.

Discussion of disarmament has intensified since the power balance was upended by last year’s war with Israel and the ousting of Hezbollah’s Syrian ally, ex-president Bashar al-Assad.

Hezbollah emerged severely weakened from the 2024 conflict with Israel when its top leaders and thousands of its fighters were killed and much of its rocket arsenal destroyed.

The senior Hezbollah official said the group was ready to discuss its arms in the context of a national defense strategy but this hinged on Israel pulling out its troops from five hilltops in south Lebanon.

A boy attends the funeral of Hezbollah fighters, killed before the November ceasefire with Israel, in the southern Lebanese village of al-Taybeh, near the border with Israel on April 6, 2025. (Rabih Daher/AFP)

Hezbollah’s position on potential discussions about its arms has not been previously reported. The sources spoke on condition of anonymity due to political sensitivities.

Hezbollah’s media office did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The presidency declined to comment.

Israel, which sent ground troops into south Lebanon during the war, has largely withdrawn but decided in February not to leave the five hilltop positions. It said it intended eventually to hand them over to Lebanese troops once it was sure the security situation allowed.

Renewed focus on Hezbollah’s arms

Despite a ceasefire since November, Israeli airstrikes have kept pressure on the terror group while Washington has demanded Hezbollah disarm and is preparing for nuclear talks with Hezbollah’s Iranian backers.

Hezbollah has been the most powerful of the paramilitary groups Iran has backed across the region, but its supply lines to Iran via Syria have been cut by Assad’s ouster.

Reuters reported on Monday that several Iranian-backed militia groups in Iraq are prepared to disarm for the first time to avert the threat of an escalating conflict with the Trump administration in the US.

Hezbollah has long rejected calls from its critics in Lebanon to disarm, describing its weapons as vital to defending the country from Israel. Deep differences over its arsenal spilled into a short civil war in 2008.

A cache of Hezbollah weapons found by troops in the Wadi Saluki area of southern Lebanon, in a handout photo issued on December 31, 2024. (Israel Defense Forces)

The group’s critics say the group has unilaterally dragged Lebanon into conflicts and the presence of its large arsenal outside of government control has undermined the state.

Two sources familiar with Hezbollah’s thinking said it is weighing handing to the army its most potent weapons north of the Litani, including drones and anti-tank missiles.

Call for a disarmament timetable

Aoun has said Hezbollah’s weaponry must be addressed through dialogue because any attempts to disarm the group by force would prompt conflict, the sources said.

Patriarch Bechara Boutros Al-Rai, the head of Lebanon’s Maronite church, said last week it was time for all weapons to be in state hands but this would need time and diplomacy because “Lebanon cannot bear a new war.”

Communication channels with relevant stakeholders are being opened to “begin studying the transfer of weapons” to state control, after the army and security services had extended state authority across Lebanon, a Lebanese official said, saying this was a move to implement Aoun’s policy.

The issue was also being discussed with Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri, an important Hezbollah ally, who plays a key role in narrowing differences, she said.

US envoy Morgan Ortagus, who visited Beirut at the weekend, repeated Washington’s position that Hezbollah and other armed groups should be disarmed as soon as possible and the Lebanese army was expected to do the job.

“It’s clear that Hezbollah has to be disarmed and it’s clear that Israel is not going to accept terrorists shooting at them, into their country, and that’s a position we understand,” Ortagus said in an April 6 interview with Lebanon’s LBCI television.

A handout photo provided by the Lebanese Presidency on April 5, 2025, shows Lebanon’s President Joseph Aoun (R) meeting with US Deputy Special Envoy for the Middle East Morgan Ortagus (C) at the Presidential Palace in Baabda, Lebanon. (Lebanese Presidency / AFP)

Several Lebanese government ministers want a disarmament timetable, said Kamal Shehadi, a minister affiliated with the anti-Hezbollah Lebanese Forces party. Shehadi told Reuters disarmament should take no more than six months, citing post-civil war militia disarmament as a precedent.

A timetable — which presumably would impose deadlines on the process — is, he said, the “only way to protect our fellow citizens from the recurring attacks that are costing lives, costing the economy and causing destruction.”

The most recent conflict began when Hezbollah began firing on northern communities and army posts in support of Hamas, a day after the Palestinian terror group’s October 7, 2023, invasion of southern Israel.

Hezbollah leader Naim Qassem in a March 29 speech said his group no longer has an armed presence south of the Litani, and had stuck to the ceasefire deal while Israel breached it “every day.” Israel has accused Hezbollah of maintaining military infrastructure in the south.

Hezbollah has put the onus on the Lebanese state to get Israel to withdraw and stop its attacks. Qassem said there was still time for diplomatic solutions. But he warned that the “resistance is present and ready” and indicated it could resort “to other options” if Israel doesn’t adhere to the deal.