Report: PA, Hamas agree to form committee to run post-war Gaza

Displaced Palestinians line up to receive food at a distribution centre in Deir el-Balah in the central Gaza Strip on November 26, 2024 (BASHAR TALEB / AFP)

Displaced Palestinians line up to receive food at a distribution centre in Deir el-Balah in the central Gaza Strip on November 26, 2024 (BASHAR TALEB / AFP)

The Palestinian Authority and Hamas have signed a document agreeing to form a joint committee that would run the post-war Gaza Strip, the London-based pan-Arab news site Al-Araby Al-Jadeed reports.

The news site says it has a copy of the document that was signed to formulate the committee, to be made of 10-15 leading Palestinian figures.

The report comes a day after Egypt’s foreign minister said that rival Palestinian groups Fatah and Hamas were in Cairo for talks seeking to bring post-war Gaza under the full control of the Fatah-dominated Palestinian Authority.

Gaza has been under the authority of Hamas since it used force to take the territory in 2007 from the Fatah movement, which currently rules over parts of the West Bank under the PA. Repeated attempts at mending the rift between Fatah and Hamas have failed, wrecked by the factions’ bitter rivalry over power.

The talks are part of Egypt’s broader mediation efforts to broker a ceasefire between Israel and the Hamas terror group and to expand humanitarian access to the enclave.

The document laid out six commitments largely designed to unite the West Bank and Gaza under one political entity.

They would be responsible for overseeing health and economic services, agriculture and vital infrastructure.

It was unclear if Israel would agree to the deal being formulated. Israel rejects any role by Hamas in Gaza after the war is ended, and has said it does not trust the rival PA of Mahmoud Abbas to run the enclave.


“Takfiri groups are good news for enemies of the world of Islam,” Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei wrote on X.

ALEX WINSTON

DECEMBER 2, 2024 10:55
Updated: DECEMBER 2, 2024 11:01
 Illustrative image of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei (photo credit: Canva, REUTERS/MAHMOUD HASSANO, SANA/HANDOUT VIA REUTERS)
Illustrative image of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei
(photo credit: Canva, REUTERS/MAHMOUD HASSANO, SANA/HANDOUT VIA REUTERS)

At a time when Hezbollah and Israel have signed a shaky ceasefire, and Hamas is seriously weakened in Gaza, one of Iran’s other proxy strongholds in the Middle East is causing increasing concern for the ayatollahs of the Islamic Republic of Iran: Syria.

Dozens of Syrian army soldiers have been killed as rebels of the Islamist terror group Hayat Tahrir al-Sham swept into the major city of Aleppo, forcing the army to redeploy in the biggest challenge to President Bashar al-Assad in years.

Russia, a major Assad ally, said its air force had carried out strikes on Syrian rebels in support of the country’s army and followed what was the boldest rebel assault for years in a civil war where front lines had largely been frozen since 2020.

Iranian-backed militias also entered Syria on Sunday night from Iraq to support Assad and were heading to northern Syria to reinforce the beleaguered Syrian army forces battling insurgents, according to Syrian army sources. Dozens of Iran-aligned Iraqi Hashd al Shaabi fighters from Iraq also crossed into Syria through a military route near the Al Bukamal crossing.

Hayat Tahrir al-Sham, or HTS, once known as the Nusra Front, is designated a terrorist group by the US, Russia, Turkey, and other states. Most Syria- watchers, whilst appreciating the need for the Syrian Civil War to finally be ended, would be worried at the sudden military rise of a terror group similar in beliefs to ISIS or al-Qaeda.

Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei meets with Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, in Tehran, Iran May 30, 2024. (credit: Office of the Iranian Supreme Leader/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via REUTERS)

Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei meets with Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, in Tehran, Iran May 30, 2024. (credit: Office of the Iranian Supreme Leader/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via REUTERS)

To throw his opinion into the mix, Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei sent out a post on X on Sunday evening addressing the current situation in Syria, stating, “Takfiri groups are good news for enemies of the world of Islam. Exactly at a time when all Islamic Ummah’s attention is focused on the issue of Palestine, Takfiri groups, instead of concentrating on Zionist regime’s malevolent nature, draw the attention to other places.

Khamenei’s tweet criticizes takfiri groups, a term often used to describe extremist Sunni factions that declare other Muslims apostates (Takfir). He accused these groups of serving the interests of Islam’s enemies, such as the United States and Israel, by diverting attention away from the Palestinian cause and the “malevolent nature” of the Zionist regime (Israel).

This perspective aligns with Khamenei’s long-standing belief in the umma –  that unity among Muslims is essential to resist external threats, particularly Israel. By engaging in internal conflicts—like those in Syria—takfiri groups weaken the Islamic world and shift focus from what Khamenei views as the central issue: Palestinian liberation and opposition to Zionism.

Khamenei, while embodying the Shia theocratic model, often invokes the concept of the umma, or Muslim community at large, to assert Iran’s leadership in a broader Islamist struggle.

A relationship worth saving?

Iran and Syria’s alliance began in the aftermath of Iran’s 1979 Islamic Revolution. Syria, under former president Hafez al-Assad, was one of the first Arab nations to back Iran during the Iran-Iraq War. The shared hostility toward Israel and opposition to Western influence in the Middle East cemented their ties. Syria also provided critical logistical support to Iran, allowing the passage of arms and supplies to Hezbollah, the Iranian-backed militia in Lebanon – something Israel has spent years trying to disrupt but amped up its pressure since the war against Hezbollah erupted after October 7.

The Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC), particularly its Quds Force, has been the primary actor managing Iran’s relationship with Syria. The Quds Force, tasked with overseeing Iran’s extraterritorial operations, established a significant presence in Syria to support both strategic goals and ideological ones, such as exporting the Islamic Revolution’s principles. Iran’s support for Syria includes arms supplies, economic aid, and the training of pro-Assad militias.

The onset of Syria’s civil war in 2011 marked a turning point in the relationship. Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, like his father Hafez, positioned himself as a key ally of Iran. When anti-Assad protests escalated into a violent conflict, the IRGC intervened decisively to ensure Assad’s survival, as losing Syria would have been a strategic blow to Iran’s regional influence.

Iran has since poured billions of dollars into Syria, supplying arms, deploying IRGC officers, and recruiting militias from across the region, including Afghan, Pakistani, and Iraqi fighters. This intervention helped Assad regain control over much of the country. Iran also viewed the war as a chance to expand its “axis of resistance” against Israel, consolidating a land corridor from Tehran to the Mediterranean.

The Assad family’s secular Ba’athist ideology contrasts with Iran’s theocratic Shi’a governance, but their partnership endures due to shared goals. Both regimes oppose US policies in the region, support Palestinian resistance groups, and resist Sunni-dominated powers like Saudi Arabia and Turkey. For Iran, Syria acts as a critical bridge to Hezbollah in Lebanon and provides access to Israel’s borders, enhancing its deterrence strategy.

While the Iran-Syria alliance remains strong, it faces challenges, including economic pressures and differing priorities in post-war reconstruction. Syria’s dependence on Russia has introduced a new player into the dynamic, sometimes complicating Iran’s influence. However, the IRGC’s deep entrenchment in Syrian security and economic structures ensures its continued leverage.

The relationship between Iran, the IRGC, and Syria is a multifaceted alliance defined by strategic necessity, ideological convergence, and mutual survival against shared adversaries. The IRGC’s role as Iran’s external arm ensures that Syria remains central to Iran’s regional ambitions.

Missing friends

Over the course of 2024, Khamenei has lost some of his closest allies.

The elimination of figures like Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah, Hamas political chief Ismail Haniyeh (killed in Tehran itself), and Hamas’s Gaza chief Yahya Sinwar will have led the Iranian leadership to be desperate to keep Assad, their closest ally in the region, in power. No matter what the cost.

In Khamenei’s eyes, the umma is not just a concept but a mission embodied in the jihadist groups that Iran backs and the IRGC’s extensive reach. His post, accusing HTS of drawing attention away from Israel’s wars and the Palestinian issue is merely a pretense diverting away from the real issue and his real message: Assad must stay in power, or Iran’s influence will be critically wounded in Israel’s periphery.


“The Iranians have paid a very high price for operating all their proxies against Israel over the past year,” explained Sabati.

MAYA COHEN

DECEMBER 2, 2024 09:25
Updated: DECEMBER 2, 2024 10:31
 IRAN’S SUPREME Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei attends Friday prayers and a memorial ceremony for Hassan Nasrallah in Tehran earlier this month. (photo credit: Office of the Iranian Supreme Leader/West Asia News Agency/Reuters)
IRAN’S SUPREME Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei attends Friday prayers and a memorial ceremony for Hassan Nasrallah in Tehran earlier this month.
(photo credit: Office of the Iranian Supreme Leader/West Asia News Agency/Reuters)
The surprising offensive by Sunni rebels in Syria reveals a deep crisis in Iran’s strategy, Institute for National Security Studies researcher Benny Sabati said in a recent interview with Maariv, arguing that Tehran’s efforts in combatting Israel left the Islamic Republic depleted.

“The Iranians have paid a very high price for operating all their proxies against Israel over the past year,” explained Sabati.

Iran finds itself significantly weakened

“Their command has been eliminated, their soldiers and field commanders – many of whom are in Hezbollah, Hamas, and other groups,” Sabati noted. As a result, “Iran is entering the campaign in Syria in a very weak state; it has no means to help Assad’s regime at all.”

This double blow is not only about the inability to provide assistance but also about inflicting harm.

“They targeted a general and several IRGC members, killed them, and captured the Iranian consulate. On one hand, Iran is unable to assist; on the other, it has become a target itself.”

 Members of Syrian opposition fighters walk along a street in Aleppo, after the Syrian army said that dozens of its soldiers had been killed in a major attack by rebels who swept into the city, in Syria November 30, 2024. (credit: REUTERS/MAHMOUD HASSANO)
Members of Syrian opposition fighters walk along a street in Aleppo, after the Syrian army said that dozens of its soldiers had been killed in a major attack by rebels who swept into the city, in Syria November 30, 2024. (credit: REUTERS/MAHMOUD HASSANO)

Struggling with parallel fronts

According to Sabati, Iran’s problem is compounded by its inability to manage simultaneous fronts.

“The Iranians have an issue. They neither like nor believe in fighting on two fronts. When they’re focused on the Israeli front, that’s all they deal with,” Sabati said.

“They likely had to neglect this front of the extremist Sunnis,” Sabati added. “They’ve abandoned it for the past two or three years in favor of focusing on Israel.”

The consequences of this neglect are now becoming evident, the researcher argued.

“Now the genie is out of the bottle.”


urning to Russia for help

In search of a solution, Iran turned to Russia, he continued. “Iran’s foreign minister spoke last night with Russia’s foreign minister, asking for help.”

However, even the Iranian foreign minister’s visit to Damascus seemed futile, Sabati added.

“He can come to encourage – that’s all he can do. They don’t have much in their pocket.”

Domestic criticism and regional implications

The situation is escalating amid internal criticism in Iran, as “the public is very angry about the aid provided to regional countries and all the terrorist organizations,” said Sabati.

Meanwhile, the regional implications largely depend on Russia’s response.

“If the Russians intervene and suppress this rebellion, it’s a different story. If they don’t, we will witness a significant weakening of both Iran and the Syrian regime.”