‘The estimation is that there are many dozens of dead, if not more.’

By Vered Weiss, World Israel News

Although the official number indicates that a dozen Hezbollah terrorists have been killed over the last two days by exploding pagers, it is most likely higher than what has been reported.

Ronen Bergman, who writes for the New York Times and Yediot Ahronoth, says the number of people killed by the beeper explosions is higher than the reported 12 yesterday and 14 today.

“The estimation is that there are many dozens of dead, if not more,” he said.

In addition, the mission caused massive damage to Hezbollah’s Radwan unit, which has lost much of its leadership.

Israel has not commented on the deadly explosions, which are widely attributed to Israel.

The offensive on Tuesday involved the spontaneous explosion of thousands of beepers used by Hezbollah terrorists, wounding thousands and killing over a dozen, according to reports.

Additional injuries and deaths occurred on Wednesday in Lebanon and in Syria, where 19 IRGC terrorists were killed and 150 were injured.

A former commander of British military forces in Afghanistan, Colonel Richard Kemp, praised the beeper offensive against Hezbollah as “precise and discriminatory” and effective at weakening the morale and capacity of the Lebanese terror group.

Israel’s outsmarting them with this terror attack has led to Hezbollah’s “demoralization.”

Kemp also praised the mission because it effectively targeted only terrorists and limited civilian casualties.

“It’s hard to think of a more precise and discriminating method of attack than detonating pagers known to be specifically assigned to individual terrorists, using devices that limit the potential for collateral damage.”

He added that the exploding beepers were intended only for terrorists who are “legitimate and lawful targets for attack as Israel seeks to defend its citizens from violent aggression,” he said.

Kemp added that three distinctive characteristics of the mission made it particularly effective.

First, the mission resulted in extensive damage to Hezbollah, second it engendered anxiety in Hezbollah members and may discourage others from joining and third, it has humiliated Hezbollah on the world stage.


by Debbie Weiss

An ambulance arrives at a hospital as thousands of people, mainly Hezbollah fighters, were wounded on Sept. 17, 2024 when the pagers they use to communicate exploded across Lebanon. Photo: REUTERS/Mohamed Azakir

An Israeli cyber and national security expert has claimed that the exploding pagers carried by Hezbollah members in Lebanon, which left thousands wounded and killed at least nine people on Tuesday, were part of a sophisticated attack that was planned at least half a year before the war in Gaza erupted.

Dr. Eyal Pinko, a former navy commander and senior research fellow at the Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies, dismissed theories that the blasts were caused by lithium batteries that were hacked to become overheated, and said that the nature of the wounds seen in footage emerging from Lebanon was consistent with those caused by explosives such as TNT and HTB.

“To get this kind of wound you need to have between one to two grams of type of explosives, which is not a big technological issue — you just need to open the beeper,” Pinko said during a briefing with reporters on Tuesday evening. He added that a stable explosive that wouldn’t detonate accidentally would have been inserted into the device, along with a small control mechanism capable of receiving remote commands via a call or page.

Such an operation would have required significant infiltration of Hezbollah’s communication systems, according to Pinko, and planting explosives in pagers would necessitate a serious breach of the supply chain. “This is an intelligence operation that was very well planned, prepared for more than one and a half years,” Pinko said

Pinko alluded to the possibility of a coordinated effort, suggesting that Israel may not have acted alone if it was behind the attack in Lebanon, where Hezbollah wields significant political and military clout. He noted efforts by Germany, France, the US, and the UK to prevent escalation in the region.

Israel has so far been quiet about the explosions, but senior Lebanese officials have blame the Jewish state. So too has Hezbollah, which said Israel would receive “its fair punishment.”

The operation clearly appeared to serve as a message to Hezbollah, showcasing vulnerabilities in its security apparatus and serving as a form of deterrence, Pinko said. “It’s saying that, ‘you’re already being penetrated. We know where you are and what you do. Now look what we can do: In one single shot, in less than a second, we can eliminate almost 3,000 terror operatives.’”

Meanwhile, Sky News Arabia quoted an Israeli military source as saying that Hezbollah’s supply chain was infiltrated with the Mossad, Israel’s intelligence agency, placing PETN, a highly explosive stable material, on the batteries of the devices.

A source close to Hezbollah, speaking on condition of anonymity, told AFP that the pagers were “sabotaged at the source” before being imported by Hezbollah, an Iran-backed terrorist organization based in Lebanon.

Al Jazeera said that the pagers had been in use by Hezbollah operatives for five months.

Brigadier General (res) Amir Avivi, founder of the Israel Defense and Security Forum (IDSF), told The Algemeiner that the attack “had the Mossad’s fingerprints all over it.”

“Hezbollah certainly got the message,” Avivi said, adding that war between Israel and the Iran-backed terror group was “imminent.”

However, Pinko said that Tuesday’s coordinated attacks were not a prelude to a full ground invasion into Lebanon and that Israel was likely to adopt a “wait and see” approach. “Israel doesn’t want to go towards further escalation; not in the north, and not with the Houthis in Yemen. They just want to finish the business in Gaza.”

The explosions came hours after a revelation by the Israeli Shin Bet security agency that a Hezbollah cell had infiltrated Israel with the intent to assassinate a former senior defense official in Tel Aviv using a mobile phone, camera, and remote detonation.

Hezbollah has fired barrages of rockets, missiles, and drones at northern Israel almost daily following the Oct. 7 attacks by Hamas-led Palestinian terrorists on the Jewish state’s southern region. Since then, both sides have been exchanging fire constantly while avoiding a major escalation as war rages in Gaza to the south.

About 80,000 Israelis have been forced to evacuate their homes in northern Israel and flee to other parts of the country amid the unrelenting attacks from Hezbollah.

Israeli leaders have said they seek a diplomatic resolution to the conflict with Hezbollah along the border with Lebanon but are prepared to use large-scale military force if needed to ensure all citizens can safely return to their homes.

On Monday night, Israel’s security cabinet expanded its war goals to include returning the displaced Israelis from the north.


Why the Hamas hostage deal won’t bring peace – opinion

A proposed hostage deal may offer temporary relief, but it fails to address Iran’s broader strategy of unifying its proxies against Israel.

 HEZBOLLAH SUPPORTERS rally in solidarity with Palestinians in Gaza, in Beirut’s southern suburbs, last November. The writer calls for shifting international pressure away from Israel and redirecting it toward Hamas and Hezbollah. (photo credit: ESA ALEXANDER/REUTERS)
HEZBOLLAH SUPPORTERS rally in solidarity with Palestinians in Gaza, in Beirut’s southern suburbs, last November. The writer calls for shifting international pressure away from Israel and redirecting it toward Hamas and Hezbollah.
(photo credit: ESA ALEXANDER/REUTERS)
The hostage deal proposal being promoted by the United States, Egypt, and Qatar acting as mediators between Israel and Hamas might, at most, present a temporary ceasefire, but it does not promise long-term de-escalation in the Middle East. Sadly, the deal would not even lead to the release of all Israeli hostages.

If this deal would go ahead, however, it will fail to prevent Iran’s “unity of the fronts” strategy. Tehran’s overarching goal is to unify its proxies – such as Hamas and Hezbollah – across the region in their fight against Israel. This ambition means that despite temporary lulls in hostilities, Iran and its allies will not abandon their goals, while providing an opportunity for all sides, including Iranian-backed terrorist organizations such as Hamas and Hezbollah, to regroup and recover.

To understand the current dynamics, it’s essential to recognize that this is not just another chapter in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Iran is spearheading a much broader regional campaign to encircle Israel with hostile forces. The ongoing efforts of terror organizations like Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in Gaza are part of a larger strategic framework aimed at weakening Israel’s defenses and expanding Iran’s influence.

This is why there is no urgency among these players to reach a ceasefire, and it looks like the whole campaign has shifted toward a war of attrition against Israel on various fronts.

Given this, the question arises: What could be done to secure a lasting solution?

 People waving Nazi swastika flags argue with conservatives during a protest outside the Tampa Convention Center, where Turning Point USA's (TPUSA) Student Action Summit (SAS) is being held, in Tampa, Florida, U.S. July 23, 2022.  (credit: REUTERS/MARCO BELLO)Enlrage image
People waving Nazi swastika flags argue with conservatives during a protest outside the Tampa Convention Center, where Turning Point USA’s (TPUSA) Student Action Summit (SAS) is being held, in Tampa, Florida, U.S. July 23, 2022. (credit: REUTERS/MARCO BELLO)

Hamas and Hezbollah are immediate threats on Israel’s southern and northern borders. While Hezbollah has linked its own operations to the situation in Gaza, it’s important to recognize that a ceasefire in Gaza will not disarm them. Hezbollah, the Shi’ite Lebanese terror army, remains heavily armed and continues to pose a significant threat to Israel with its missile stockpiles and well-trained military operatives. Even in the event of a ceasefire, Israel must take a proactive stance in dealing with these terrorist groups. This requires both military action and international diplomacy.

Shifting international pressure away from Israel, often called upon to compromise on its security, and redirecting the pressure toward terrorist organizations like Hamas and Hezbollah, would be one of the most effective approaches. The international community must understand that these groups are not legitimate political actors but terrorist organizations that pose a significant threat to regional stability. One should not assume they will respect agreements.

The international community can apply levers of influence such as financial sanctions, intelligence sharing, and military cooperation to weaken these groups.

Moreover, Israel must ensure that negotiations, whether about hostages or other issues, have clear deadlines. Without strict timelines, as seen in the prolonged nuclear negotiations with Iran, the other side gains time to achieve incremental successes, whether militarily or politically.

President Joe Biden

One of the key lessons from the current situation is the age-old adage, “If you want peace, prepare for war.” US President Joe Biden’s recent deployment of military assets to the Middle East serves as a clear signal to Iran. The US appears ready to deter Iranian aggression, but this show of force must extend to Iran’s proxies, who continue to test Israel’s defenses along its northern and southern borders.

Israel cannot afford to face Iran and its proxies alone. This is a battle that requires a broad international coalition, particularly with Western powers. While Israel is responsible for securing its borders and neutralizing immediate threats, dealing with Iran’s long-term ambitions demands coordination with the US and other allies.

Although the US seems eager to support Israel in its defensive operations, one should anticipate certain limitations. Israel cannot rely on American troops to defend its northern border, but it should expect Washington to provide the necessary military support, including weapons and ammunition, as well as backing in the UN Security Council. Furthermore, in the event that a military campaign against Iran becomes necessary, the United States must be a key partner.

This will require careful preparation and time. Israel cannot act alone. Strong coordination with the US and other Western allies is essential to confronting both the immediate threats posed by terrorist groups and the longer-term challenge of Iran’s regional ambitions and nuclear threat.

The recent hostage deal – if it will be signed – offers only a temporary pause in the conflict at best, not a lasting solution. After the massacre of October 7, Israel cannot afford to live under the constant threat of terrorism on its borders. The international community, for its part, cannot afford to see the Iranian radical axis spread its dark and fanatical vision across the Middle East, and beyond.

The writer, a retired IDF lieutenant-colonel, is the founder and president of the Alma Research and Education Center, which specializes in dealing with Israel’s security challenges on its northern borders.