Hamas continues staunch refusal to disarm

In interview with Drop Site, senior Hamas official Basem Naim rejects unilateral disarmament and links any weapons talks to ceasefire and statehood.

Hamas terrorists in Gaza

Hamas terrorists in GazaAbed Rahim Khatib/Flash90

Senior Hamas official Basem Naim has told the far-left American outlet Drop Site that the terrorist organization will not agree to unilateral disarmament demands.

The interview comes as President Donald Trump and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu have reiterated calls for the demilitarization of Gaza as part of efforts to move forward with reconstruction and a potential second phase of a ceasefire arrangement.

Naim, who has been involved in ceasefire discussions, told Drop Site that Hamas “will not accede to sweeping demands” to disarm and would reject what he described as total demilitarization of the Gaza Strip. He said the group’s position is tied to broader political conditions.

“Our position on this matter is very clear,” Naim said. “Before speaking about disarmament or confiscation of weapons, we believe it is necessary for Netanyahu and his extremist government, along with the mediators and the American guarantor, to ensure full implementation of everything agreed upon in the first phase.”

He added that the issue is “fundamentally political, not security-based,” and argued that the solution lies in ending what he termed the “Zionist occupation.”

Naim maintained that Hamas is willing to discuss the status of its weapons only within the framework of a long-term ceasefire and a political process that would lead to the establishment of a Palestinian state. According to him, during such a period, the resistance would commit to a ceasefire under Palestinian, Arab, and international supervision, and weapons could be removed from active use and stored.

“Israel must be restrained from continuing the aggression, and it must be ensured that a multi-year ceasefire-three, five, or seven years-runs parallel to the political process,” he said.

Addressing proposals for disarmament without reciprocal guarantees, Naim asked, “How can there be talk of disarmament while the aggression continues and Netanyahu does not commit to the ceasefire?” He further questioned whether disarmament would leave Israel free to operate militarily in Gaza without restrictions.

Naim also criticized statements suggesting that disarmament must precede reconstruction or Israeli withdrawal. Referring to remarks attributed to international officials, he said, “It is a disgrace to hear some American or international politician saying, ‘Either disarmament or war.’”


After using 14 GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrators (MOP) during Operation Midnight Hammer against Iranian nuclear facilities, the USAF needs to replenish its arsenal.

B-2 bomber drops a GBU-57 during a test
B-2 bomber drops a GBU-57 during a test
(photo credit: US AIR FORCE)
Amid high tensions between the US and Iran, the US Air Force has awarded Boeing a sole-source contract to replenish its arsenal of GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP) bunker buster bombs, which the US dropped over a dozen on Iranian nuclear facilities in June during Operation Midnight Hammer.

According to a partially redacted justification notice posted online last week, the US Air Force said that it was awarding Boeing the sole-source contract because “this procurement and sustainment activity is critically needed to replenish the inventory of GBU-57’s, ended during Operation Midnight Hammer (21 June 25).”

Boeing is the only company that makes the GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator, and the justification notice is intended to explain why the Pentagon did not carry out a fully competitive tender for the specially designed munition.

“No delay in award is acceptable for this effort. Delaying this requirement would undermine force readiness and efficient acquisitions for this key weapons program. A delay undermines Combatant Commanders’ capabilities, jeopardizes force readiness and strategic deterrence, hinders nuclear proliferation prevention efforts, and could result in loss of life,” the document read.

A US Air Force B-2 Spirit stealth bomber is prepared for operations before Operation Midnight Hammer, at Whiteman Air Force Base, Missouri, US, June 2025
A US Air Force B-2 Spirit stealth bomber is prepared for operations before Operation Midnight Hammer, at Whiteman Air Force Base, Missouri, US, June 2025 (credit: US AIR FORCE/HANDOUT VIA REUTERS)

The exact number of BGU-57s being purchased and the cost of the contract, along with delivery dates, were not published.

What is the MOP?

Developed in the early 2000s by Boeing and the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA), the GBU-57 MOP was designed to neutralize Hard and Deeply Buried Targets (HDBTs) – including underground labs, command centers, and chemical, biological, and nuclear facilities.

An Air Force fact sheet described the MOP as “a weapon system designed to accomplish a difficult, complicated mission of reaching and destroying our adversaries’ weapons of mass destruction located in well-protected facilities.”

Weighing 30,000 pounds (13,600 kilograms), with the warhead alone weighing 5,740 pounds (2,600 kg) and measuring over 20 feet (6 meters) in length, the MOP can penetrate up to 200 feet  (60 m.) of earth or 60 feet (18 m.) of reinforced concrete, making it the most powerful non-nuclear bomb in the US arsenal.

According to a report in Scientific American, the kinetic strike “delivers 800 to 900 megajoules (about 758,000 to 853,000 British thermal units) of kinetic energy – comparable to a 285-ton (285,000 kg.) Boeing 747-400 touching down at 170 mph (274 kph) or a 565-ton (565,000 kg.) Amtrak Acela train moving at 120 mph (193 kph).”

First operational use-Iran

Operation Midnight Hammer, which targeted Iran’s deeply buried nuclear facilities in June 2025, was the first-ever combat use of the MOP. During the operation, seven B-2 Spirit bombers dropped 14 GBU-57s on sites in Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan – locations long suspected of housing critical components of Iran’s nuclear program.

While US officials hailed the mission as a success, independent assessments suggested mixed results. Fordow reportedly suffered severe damage, but Natanz and Isfahan may recover faster than anticipated.

The operation highlighted both the strengths and limitations of the MOP, particularly its massive size as well as its limited aircraft compatibility, the challenge of penetrating ultra-hardened targets, and Iran’s continued development of sophisticated defenses.


“This gets us closer to deploy nuclear power when and where it is needed to give our nation’s warfighters the tools to win in battle,” said Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment.

Cooling towers at the former Three Mile Island Nuclear power plant during a tour by Constellation Energy in Londonderry Township, Pennsylvania, US, June 25, 2025
Cooling towers at the former Three Mile Island Nuclear power plant during a tour by Constellation Energy in Londonderry Township, Pennsylvania, US, June 25, 2025
(photo credit: REUTERS/EDUARDO MUNOZ)
The US Departments of Energy and Defense on Sunday for the first time transported a small nuclear reactor on a cargo plane from California to Utah to demonstrate the potential to quickly deploy nuclear power for military and civilian use.

The agencies partnered with California-based Valar Atomics to fly one of the company’s Ward microreactors on a C-17 aircraft, without nuclear fuel, to Hill Air Force Base in Utah.

Energy Secretary Chris Wright and Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment Michael Duffey were on the C-17 flight with the reactor and its components, and hailed the event as a breakthrough for US nuclear energy and military logistics.

“This gets us closer to deploy nuclear power when and where it is needed to give our nation’s warfighters the tools to win in battle,” Duffey said.

President Donald Trump‘s administration sees small nuclear reactors as one of several ways to expand US energy production. Last May, Trump issued four executive orders aimed at boosting domestic nuclear deployment to meet growing energy demand, support national security, and advance competitive AI.

US President Donald Trump speaks during a reception with business leaders, at the 56th annual World Economic Forum (WEF), in Davos, Switzerland, January 21, 2026.
US President Donald Trump speaks during a reception with business leaders, at the 56th annual World Economic Forum (WEF), in Davos, Switzerland, January 21, 2026. (credit: REUTERS/JONATHAN ERNST)

Energy Department issues grants to help accelerate developing modular reactors

The Energy Department in December issued two grants to help accelerate the development of small modular reactors.

Proponents of microreactors have also touted them as energy sources that can be sent to remote locations, offering an alternative to diesel generators, which require frequent fuel deliveries. But skeptics have argued that the industry has not demonstrated that small nuclear reactors can generate power at a reasonable cost.

“There is no business case for microreactors, which, even if they work as designed, will produce electricity at a far higher cost than large nuclear reactors, not to mention renewables like wind or solar,” said Edwin Lyman, director of nuclear power safety at the Union of Concerned Scientists.

The Energy Department plans to have three microreactors reach “criticality,”  when a nuclear reaction can sustain itself, by July 4, Wright said.

The microreactor in Sunday’s event, a little larger than a minivan, can generate up to 5 megawatts of electricity, enough to power 5,000 homes, according to Valar CEO Isaiah Taylor. It will start operating in July at 100 kilowatts and peak at 250 kilowatts this year before ramping up to full capacity, he said.

Valar hopes to start selling power on a test basis in 2027 and become fully commercial in 2028. Although private industry funds its own development of nuclear technology, it also needs the federal government “doing some enabling actions to allow fuel fabrication here and uranium enrichment here,” he said.

Fuel for Valar’s reactor will be transported from the Nevada National Security site to the San Rafael facility, Wright told reporters.

However, even small generators result in a significant amount of radioactive waste, Lyman said. Other experts have said designers are not compelled to consider waste at inception, beyond a plan for its management.

Although disposal of nuclear waste remains unresolved, the Energy Department is in talks with a few states, including Utah, to host sites that could reprocess fuel or handle permanent disposal, Wright said.