US considers deploying nuclear weapons in new countries

According to a Financial Times report, the Pentagon wants to reassure European countries following announcements about the withdrawal of forces from the continent. Among the countries interested in an American nuclear presence on their soil are Poland and the Baltic states.

The US is discussing whether to deploy nuclear weapons in additional European NATO countries, in a move intended to reassure allies that reduced conventional military support does not weaken security guarantees, the British newspaper Financial Times reported today.

US officials have indicated openness to deploying additional weapons beyond the six existing countries that host nuclear-capable bombers, three people briefed on the matter told the British newspaper.

The talks, which are highly classified and may not lead to changes in nuclear weapons-sharing arrangements, come amid broad concern in Europe over Donald Trump’s moves to withdraw US troops and critical weapons systems from the continent.

The move could allow additional countries to host American dual-capable aircraft, which are capable of carrying out nuclear strikes. Two of the people said the willingness to discuss expansion was meant to demonstrate the US commitment to providing a nuclear umbrella even as NATO allies were forced to shoulder more of the burden of conventional defense.

A B-2 Spirit stealth bomber that carried out the strike in Iran. Photo: AP

Countries on NATO’s eastern flank, including Poland and several Baltic states, have expressed interest in hosting dual-capable aircraft bases, the sources said. Polish officials have spoken particularly publicly about their desire to host nuclear weapons. Former President Andrzej Duda called on the US to expand the dual-capable aircraft initiative to Polish soil, while Warsaw joined a new French initiative this year to examine the possibility of temporarily transferring parts of France’s nuclear deterrent to allied European countries.

Discussions are continuing through NATO channels, said one person familiar with the talks, adding that the allies closest to Russia’s borders had shown the greatest interest. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and Russian President Vladimir Putin’s repeated remarks about the Kremlin’s nuclear capabilities have fueled interest among some allies in hosting dual-capable aircraft, the person added.

טנקים של צבא בפולין בלטביה , איי.פי
Polish army tanks in Latvia. Photo: AP

A second person familiar with the discussions said an agreement to expand the hosting of US nuclear weapons was not close. NATO’s nuclear-sharing program includes allies, currently Belgium, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Turkey and the UK, that are approved to host American dual-capable aircraft and “forward-deployed” nuclear bombs. These are under US custody, with Washington retaining sole authorization for their use.

NATO says the arrangement, formulated during the Cold War, “provides a platform for NATO allies that do not possess nuclear weapons to shape the alliance’s nuclear policy and planning as a means of ensuring their security without acquiring nuclear weapons.”

American nuclear weapons deployed in European countries are stored and guarded by US forces. Air groups assigned to allied countries, using F-35, F-15 and Tornado aircraft, are trained to take part in exercises and missions to demonstrate force posture and, ultimately, to deploy the bombs when the US authorizes it.

Recent moves by the Trump administration to cancel planned deployments of key weapons systems to Europe and announce the withdrawal of troops as part of an effort to shift more military assets to Asia and other regions have alarmed some NATO allies. They fear this will leave gaps in the continent’s defenses and in its ability to deter or repel any attack.

נאט"ו ודגל ארה"ב , רויטרס
NATO and US flags. Photo: Reuters

While European allies have pledged to drastically increase their defense spending and investment in key conventional military capabilities currently provided to them by the US, the nuclear umbrella is considered irreplaceable.

NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte said after a meeting of the alliance’s foreign ministers last month that there was “a shared understanding that while the US will turn more to other theaters … the overall deterrence and defense in Europe must remain the same.”

“Let me be absolutely clear … if anyone is foolish enough to attack us, the response will be devastating,” Rutte said.


After the call, Netanyahu said that he had told Trump that “if Hezbollah doesn’t stop attacking our towns and citizens – Israel will attack terror targets in Beirut.”

The joint US-Israel military strikes on Iran mark more than a tactical military operation. They represent a fundamental realignment – President Donald Trump and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu have closed a strategic gap that successive American administrations never fully bridged.
The joint US-Israel military strikes on Iran mark more than a tactical military operation. They represent a fundamental realignment – President Donald Trump and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu have closed a strategic gap that successive American administrations never fully bridged.
(photo credit: Joe Raedle/Getty Images)

US President Donald Trump and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu spoke on Monday about the potential for a ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah.

After the call, Trump announced that Israel had agreed that “there will be no Troops going to Beirut, and any Troops that are on their way, have already been turned back.”

In exchange, he said, Hezbollah had agreed that all shooting will stop – “That Israel will not attack them, and they will not attack Israel.”

Later, Netanyahu announced that he had told Trump that “if Hezbollah doesn’t stop attacking our towns and citizens – Israel will attack terror targets in Beirut.”

He also said that the IDF would continue to operate as planned in southern Lebanon.

The Lebanese Embassy in Washington had earlier confirmed that Hezbollah had accepted the US proposal, saying that the ceasefire framework would be expanded to encompass “all Lebanese territories.”

OPERATIONS CONDUCTED by troops from the 401st Brigade in southern Lebanon.
OPERATIONS CONDUCTED by troops from the 401st Brigade in southern Lebanon. (credit: IDF SPOKESPERSON UNIT)

The embassy’s statement also claimed that Trump had told Lebanon’s Ambassador to the United States that Netanyahu had also agreed to the arrangement.

The speaker of the Lebanese parliament, Nabih Berri, had earlier informed Trump’s administration of Hezbollah‘s readiness for a ceasefire with Israel and that it has promised to guarantee that it would be implemented, Axios reported on Monday, citing Berri’s top advisor Ali Hamdan. Berri is Shia, and heads Lebanon’s Amal Movement.


The IDF announced on Sunday morning that it had taken control of the Beaufort Ridge outpost and Wadi al-Saluki areas north of the Litani River in southern Lebanon.

Smoke rises from the site of an Israeli airstrike that targeted an area in Beirut's southern neighborhoods on March 5, 2026; Illustrative.
Smoke rises from the site of an Israeli airstrike that targeted an area in Beirut’s southern neighborhoods on March 5, 2026; Illustrative.
(photo credit: FADEL ITANI/AFP via Getty Images)
Senior Israeli officials have appealed to senior US officials to allow the IDF to expand the strikes in Beirut, two sources told The Jerusalem Post on Sunday.

According to the sources, Israeli officials are hopeful that, given the lack of progress in both the negotiations between Washington and Tehran and the talks between Israel and Lebanon, the US response will be favorable.

Early Monday morning, UK Foreign Minister Yvette Cooper called on Israel to halt its Lebanon operations, saying, “It must end.”

“Israel’s military escalation in Lebanon has killed and displaced civilians, destroyed infrastructure, and eroded space for diplomacy,” said Cooper.

On Sunday, German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul called for all sides in the conflict to cease hostilities, describing Israel’s push into southern Lebanon as “cause for serious concern.”

IDF soldiers operating in Lebanon's Beaufort Ridge, shared by the military on May 31, 2026. (credit: IDF SPOKESPERSON UNIT)
IDF soldiers operating in Lebanon’s Beaufort Ridge, shared by the military on May 31, 2026. (credit: IDF SPOKESPERSON UNIT)
Advertisement

“Any further escalation will exacerbate the already tense situation and trigger new waves of displacement within Lebanon,” Wadephul added.

On Sunday morning, the IDF announced it had taken control of the Beaufort Ridge outpost and Wadi al-Saluki areas north of the Litani River in southern Lebanon. The IAF, artillery, and tanks conducted extensive support strikes against Hezbollah infrastructure in the area to reduce resistance ahead of the advance.

IDF plans Nabatiya advance, would be furthest yet

The military added that it was operating near the Hezbollah stronghold of Nabatiya and is prepared to expand operations.

Nabatiya, around 20 kilometers from the Israel-Lebanon border, would be the farthest that IDF ground forces have advanced.

The military’s ground forces were about 10 kilometers from the border when the ceasefire began on April 17.

The IDF said on Tuesday that it would invade past the ceasefire’s Yellow Line and the Litani River in response to ongoing Hezbollah drone attacks that have killed and wounded an increasing number of soldiers.

Yonah Jeremy Bob and Reuters contributed to this report.