Israel-Lebanon Maritime Deal Close to Done: Saudi Media

SEPTEMBER 4, 2022 4:31 PM

by Algemeiner Staff

London-based Energean’s drill ship begins drilling at the Karish natural gas field offshore Israel in the east Mediterranean May 9, 2022. REUTERS/Ari Rabinovitch

A maritime boundary agreement between Israel and Lebanon is nearing completion, the Saudi Arabian news channel Al-Arabiya reported Sunday.

The deal would leave the Karish gas field under Israeli control, while Lebanon would be able to develop the Qana gas field, according to anonymous sources cited by the Saudi outlet. The London-based exploration and production company Energin, which already operates in Karish, will do the same in Qana, and will pay Israel compensation due to Jerusalem’s claim of partial ownership over the latter field, the report added.

The news came as Lebanon’s presidential palace announced on Sunday that American diplomat Amos Hochstein, who has been mediating talks on the maritime issue between Jerusalem and Beirut, will arrive in Lebanon this week.

In comments run by Russian media last month, an unnamed Lebanese official said his government was close to reaching an agreement on the border dispute with Israel.

The maritime issue is rooted in competing claims of ownership over offshore energy resources in the Levant Basin, and has been a long-running point of contention between Israel and Lebanon, which do not have diplomatic relations. It has also led to increased tension in recent months with Hezbollah, the US-designated terrorist group based in Lebanon which receives the bulk of its funding and weapons from Iran

Hassan Nasrallah, the head of Hezbollah, has repeatedly threatened Israel against beginning commercial production in September in Karish without reaching a resolution with Lebanon, which has claimed the field is in disputed territory. Israel has consistently maintained that Karish is firmly within its exclusive economic zone.

“All fields are under threat, not only Karish […] no Israeli target at sea or on land is out of the reach of the resistance’s precision missiles,” Nasrallah said in July.

His comments came shortly after the Israeli military downed a drone sent from Lebanon into its territory, and intercepted other drones launched by Hezbollah towards the offshore Karish gas field in the Mediterranean.

Later in July, Hezbollah broadcasted a clip showing vessels at the Karish gas field off the Israeli coast overlaid with crosshairs and coordinates, as well as a glimpse of a missile identified as an Iranian-produced long-range anti-ship cruise missile

Nasrallah has said that the group is “escalating our rhetoric so that the Americans and Israelis submit, because the course of the collapse in Lebanon is continuing.” The country faces a dire economic plight amid high national debt, political stagnation, corruption, sectarianism, and a rollback in foreign aid.

Israeli security sources have previously told local media that threats by the Hezbollah chief indicate his understanding that a resolution to the maritime issue is imminent, and are meant to allow Hezbollah to claim that a good deal was secured due to its threats.


Tehran sends response on negotiated text • Washington is skeptical

 An anti-US mural is seen on a building at a street in Tehran, Iran August 16, 2022 (photo credit: VIA REUTERS)
An anti-US mural is seen on a building at a street in Tehran, Iran August 16, 2022
(photo credit: VIA REUTERS)

Iran has equipped 51 of its cities and towns with civil defense systems to thwart any possible foreign attack, as tensions rise with Israel and Mossad Chief David Barnea heads to Washington early this week in an attempt to thwart the nuclear deal with Tehran.

The civil defense equipment enables Iran’s armed forces to “identify and monitor threats by using round-the-clock software according to the type of the threat and risk,” Deputy Defense Minister General Mehdi Farahi was quoted as saying by Iranian media on Saturday.

Although he did not name the countries that could threaten Iran, the move comes just after Israel announced the purchase of refueling tankers that will help it attack the Islamic Republic’s nuclear sites.

Iran has accused Israel and the United States of cyberattacks in recent years that have impaired the country’s infrastructure. Iran has also accused Israel, which has neither confirmed nor denied responsibility, of sabotaging its nuclear facilities.

The four new planes are only likely to arrive in 2025, but news of their purchase comes as the Jewish state has intensified its aerial strike against Iranian targets in Syria and has spoken repeatedly of maintaining its right to act militarily against Iran even if US President Joe Biden succeeds in reviving the 2015 nuclear deal.

All eyes are now on the European Union, now that its foreign policy chief Josep Borrell has received a response from Tehran over a text that has been described as a final offer to revive the deal.

A hovercraft passes by Iran's first domestically made destroyer Jamaran on the southern shores of Iran in the Persian Gulf during inauguration maneuvers, February 21, 2010. (credit: REUTERS/EBRAHIM NOROOZI)A hovercraft passes by Iran’s first domestically made destroyer Jamaran on the southern shores of Iran in the Persian Gulf during inauguration maneuvers, February 21, 2010. (credit: REUTERS/EBRAHIM NOROOZI)

“Right now everybody, is studying this response,” Borrell’s spokesman Peter Stano said on Friday.

“The way ahead will be – as always – discussed with all participants and the US.”

In 2018, then-US president Donald Trump pulled out of the agreement and reimposed harsh sanctions on Iran, prompting Tehran to violate undertakings it had made under the pact by rebuilding stockpiles of enriched uranium and installing advanced centrifuges to speed up output.

Biden has sought to revive the deal since taking office in 2021 – and Borrell is coordinating the talks putting the agreement back in place.

In March, the nuclear deal appeared near revival.

But then EU-brokered indirect talks between Tehran and Washington broke down over several issues, including Tehran’s insistence that the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) close its probes into uranium traces found at three undeclared sites before the nuclear pact is revived.

Now the deal’s revival again seems imminent

Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson Nasser Kanaani said on Friday that Tehran’s response was constructive.

The text that w“as sent [by Iran] has a constructive approach aimed at finalizing the negotiations,” Kanaani was quoted as saying by state broadcaster IRIB on Friday.

The US State Department has already cast doubt on the possibility of progress.

“We can confirm that we have received Iran’s response through the EU,” a spokesperson said. “We are studying it and will respond through the EU, but unfortunately [the response] is not constructive.”

White House National Security Council spokesperson Adrienne Watson said that “some gaps have closed in recent weeks but others remain.”

Tehran needs stronger guarantees from Washington for the revival of a 2015 nuclear deal, its foreign minister said on Wednesday, adding that the UN International Atomic Energy Agency should drop its “politically motivated probes” of Iran’s nuclear work.

The White House on Friday rejected linking the deal’s revival with the closure of the IAEA investigation.

“There should not be any conditionality between re-implementation of the JCPOA and investigations related to Iran’s legal obligations under the Non-proliferation Treaty,” White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said, referring to the deal formally known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action.

“There should not be any conditionality between re-implementation of the JCPOA and investigations related to Iran’s legal obligations under the Non-proliferation Treaty.”

Karine Jean-Pierre

Jean-Pierre was alluding to IAEA investigation into uranium traces found at the three undeclared Iranian sites.

Resolution of the so-called safeguards investigations is critical to the UN agency, which seeks to ensure that parties to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty are not secretly diverting nuclear material which they could use to make a weapon.

“We have taken a deliberate and principled approach to these negotiations from the start. And, you know, if Iran is prepared to comply with this – with its commitments under the 2015 deal – then we are prepared to do the same,” Jean-Pierre said.

When it comes to the “IAEA investigations, the safeguards, our position is crystal clear. Iran needs to answer” the IAEA given that “it’s crystal clear the investigations are not political. They are not leverage or bargaining chips,” she said.

“Once the IAEA director general reports to the Board of Governors that the outstanding issues have been clarified and resolved, we expect them to come off the board’s agenda, and not before,” she explained.

“It would be preferable to return to the JCPOA without any open safeguard issues. The power to achieve that is fully in Iran’s hands.”

Israel opposed the 2015 deal and has opposed attempts to revive it, explaining that it strengthens rather than weakens Iran’s aggression. Barnea’s trip follows one by Defense Minister Benny Gantz and National Security Advisor Eyal Hulata last month. Prime Minister Yair Lapid also spoke with Biden last week. While in Washington, Barnea is expected to meet with members of Congress.

Meanwhile, military tensions have also been rising between the US and Iran, with Washington compelling Tehran for a second time this week to release US military sail drones that it tried to seize at sea, American officials said on Friday.

Iran has been building up its naval presence in the Red Sea, near the coast of Yemen where Tehran backs the Houthi movement.

Iran’s state television earlier on Friday acknowledged that the Iranian Navy released two US maritime drones in the Red Sea but accused the American unmanned vessels of jeopardizing maritime safety, without providing evidence.

“The (Iranian navy) frigate Jamaran seized the two vessels on Thursday to prevent any possible accident after issuing warnings to the US fleet. After international shipping lanes were secured, the two vessels were released in a safe area,” the station said.

The US Navy, in a statement, challenged that account, saying the drones were in an assigned patrol area at least four nautical miles from the nearest maritime traffic lane.

“The vessels posed no risk to naval traffic and had been operating in the general vicinity of the Southern Red Sea for more than 200 consecutive days without incident,” the Navy statement said.


The US State Department sent a senior official to Israel on Thursday to pressure the Jewish State into more concessions to “improve the quality of life for the Palestinian people” and to move closer to reaching the so-called “two-state solution.”

Assistant Secretary for Near Eastern Affairs Barbara Leaf arrived in Israel this past Thursday for a quick set of meetings with officials in Jerusalem and Ramallah before traveling on Saturday for a 24-hour visit to Jordan, another strong supporter of the two-state solution.

The State Department said in a statement to reporters that Leaf was meeting with Israeli and Palestinian Authority officials to discuss “a range of priorities, including the United States’ ironclad commitment to Israel’s security, strengthening US cooperation with Israel and the Palestinian Authority, US interest in improving the quality of life for the Palestinian people, and the Administration’s continued support for a two-state solution.”

 

According to Israel’s Channel 13 News diplomatic correspondent Moriah Ashraf Wolberg, Leaf “expressed US fears over the possibility of an “escalation” in Judea and Samaria in the coming days.

“A security official who took part in the meetings with [Leaf] told us, ‘The Americans are very upset. The number of Palestinian deaths worries them, and they fear the dynamics in [Judea and Samaria] and the increased activities of the IDF will continue,” according to the report.

A senior Israeli official who was aware of the details of the meetings with Leaf added, “The message conveyed from our side is that Israel will continue to act against terrorism wherever [such action] is needed.”

According to Axios’ Barak Ravid, the US is trying to convince the Palestinian Authority leadership not to pursue a bid for full United Nations members at the UN Security Council.

Palestinian Authority officials have emphasized they intend to go through with the request, even though they know the United States – one of the five permanent members of the Security Council – will veto and block the move.